Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Apache ActiveMQ VS Micro

Compare Apache ActiveMQ VS Micro and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache ActiveMQ logo Apache ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.

Micro logo Micro

Modern terminal-based text editor
  • Apache ActiveMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01
  • Micro Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-12-16

Apache ActiveMQ features and specs

  • Open Source
    ActiveMQ is open-source under the Apache License, making it free to use and modify. This can lead to cost savings compared to commercial solutions.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    ActiveMQ supports multiple messaging protocols, including AMQP, MQTT, OpenWire, Stomp, and others, allowing for flexible integration with various systems and applications.
  • Java Integration
    Written in Java, ActiveMQ integrates well with JVM-based applications and other Apache projects like Camel and Karaf, making it a good fit for Java-centric environments.
  • High Availability
    Features like broker clustering, network of brokers, and failover support provide robust high availability options, ensuring message delivery even in case of failures.
  • Performance and Scalability
    ActiveMQ can handle a large number of messages and users by scaling horizontally, making it suitable for both small and enterprise-level applications.
  • Admin Console
    ActiveMQ provides a web-based admin console for easy management and monitoring of the message broker, simplifying administrative tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Apache ActiveMQ

  • Complex Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for newcomers. It often requires a steep learning curve to understand all the available options and optimizations.
  • Resource Intensive
    ActiveMQ can be resource-intensive, particularly in high-throughput scenarios, which may necessitate more robust hardware for optimal performance.
  • Latency
    In certain configurations, ActiveMQ may exhibit higher latency compared to other brokers, which might not make it suitable for use cases requiring real-time guarantees.
  • Java Dependency
    As a Java-based solution, ActiveMQ requires the JVM, which can be a downside for organizations that have standardized on other technology stacks.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around ActiveMQ, it may not be as large or as active as those for other, similar open-source projects. This can lead to slower responses to issues and fewer community-based resources.
  • Documentation
    Though comprehensive, the documentation can sometimes be difficult to navigate, making it challenging for users to find specific information quickly.

Micro features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Micro provides an intuitive interface that is easy to navigate even for beginners, making it accessible for new users.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Micro is available on multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, ensuring compatibility across various platforms.
  • Lightweight
    The editor is lightweight and fast, which contributes to a smooth and responsive user experience without consuming significant system resources.
  • Plugin System
    Micro supports plugins, allowing users to extend the editor's functionality to suit their specific needs.
  • Built-in Terminal
    It includes a built-in terminal that enables users to execute commands without leaving the editor environment.
  • Syntax Highlighting
    Micro provides syntax highlighting for many programming languages, enhancing code readability.

Possible disadvantages of Micro

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more established editors like VSCode or Sublime Text, Micro may lack some advanced features and integrations.
  • Less Community Support
    The user community around Micro is smaller compared to that of other text editors, which may result in fewer available resources like plugins, themes, or tutorials.
  • Infrequent Updates
    Updates and new features may be released less frequently, as it is not as widely maintained as more mainstream editors.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Use
    While basic operations are straightforward, some advanced features and customizations may require a learning curve.
  • Limited Built-in Features
    Although plugins can extend its functionality, out of the box, Micro may not have all the built-in features that other editors offer.

Analysis of Apache ActiveMQ

Overall verdict

  • Apache ActiveMQ is generally considered a good choice for message brokering due to its comprehensive feature set, stability, and scalability. It is especially beneficial in environments where integration between different systems and technologies is necessary, thanks to its support of numerous messaging protocols.

Why this product is good

  • Apache ActiveMQ is a popular open-source message broker that is known for its flexibility and reliability. It supports multiple messaging protocols and offers features such as high availability, load balancing, and a robust set of messaging patterns. It is a mature project with a large user base and a supportive community. Its ability to integrate with various platforms and languages, along with its rich feature set, makes it a suitable choice for many applications requiring reliable message queuing.

Recommended for

    Apache ActiveMQ is recommended for enterprises looking for a reliable and scalable message broker, developers needing rich messaging functionality, and organizations that require robust support for various messaging protocols, including JMS, AMQP, STOMP, and MQTT. It is particularly well-suited for applications that need to distribute messages between different applications, languages, and platforms.

Analysis of Micro

Overall verdict

  • Micro is a good choice for users who want a lightweight, efficient, and modern text editor within the terminal. It offers enough features for daily text editing tasks while remaining easy to use and configure.

Why this product is good

  • Micro is a terminal-based text editor that offers a balance between simplicity and functionality. It provides intuitive keyboard shortcuts, plugin support, and syntax highlighting, which make it a convenient choice for both beginners and experienced users seeking an easy-to-use and fast text editing experience within the command line. Furthermore, its modern user interface and ability to be extended with Lua plugins make it adaptable to various workflows.

Recommended for

    Micro is recommended for developers, system administrators, and anyone who frequently works within a terminal environment and needs a straightforward yet powerful text editor. It's particularly suitable for those who are looking for a simpler alternative to more complex editors like Vim or Emacs.

Apache ActiveMQ videos

No Apache ActiveMQ videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Micro videos

+ Add

Microeconomics- Everything You Need to Know

More videos:

  • Review - MICROeconomics 19 Minute Review
  • Review - Game Gear Micro Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache ActiveMQ and Micro)

Apache ActiveMQ

Micro

Data Integration
100 100%
Data Integration
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
Text Editors
100% 100
Stream Processing
100 100%
Stream Processing
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
IDE
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache ActiveMQ and Micro. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache ActiveMQ and Micro

Apache ActiveMQ Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
ActiveMQ is a flexible, open-source, multi-protocol messaging broker that supports many protocols. This makes it easy for developers to use a variety of languages and platforms. The AMQP protocol facilitates integration with many applications based on different platforms. However, ActiveMQ’s high-end data accessibility capabilities are complemented by its load balancing,...
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
It is a managed information broker for Apache ActiveMQ which has simple installation and it runs message broker in cloud. It doesn’t need any special look after regular management and maintenance of the message system. It is utilized to send bulk message services.
Source: gokicker.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
Apache ActiveMQ is a popular, open-source, flexible multi-protocol messaging broker. Since it has great support for industry-based protocols, developers get access to languages and platforms. It helps in connecting clients written in languages like Python, C, C++, JavaScript, etc. With the help of the AMQP protocol, integration with many applications with different platforms...
Source: www.spec-india.com

Micro Reviews

We have no reviews of Micro yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Micro seems to be a lot more popular than Apache ActiveMQ. While we know about 80 links to Micro, we've tracked only 7 mentions of Apache ActiveMQ. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache ActiveMQ mentions (7)

View more

Micro mentions (80)

  • Trying out Zed after more than a decade of Vim/Neovim
    Check out micro: https://micro-editor.github.io/ It's a terminal editor with mouse support and sane key bindings. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Notepad++ is 21 years old
    Micro editor (https://micro-editor.github.io/) works best for me but it's terminal-based. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • In your opinion, what is the text-editor equivalent of Openbox?
    Simple yet customizable? My thoughts go to Sublime Text if you want a GUI editor and closed-source is OK, or Micro if you want a TUI editor that is open source: https://micro-editor.github.io/ Like OpenBox, most casual users can be dropped in and know their way around their interfaces, and both options are kinda lightweight compared to other modern options. There is power available for serious customization if you... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • GNU Nano 8 comes with modern key bindings
    This is great! I used to install micro[0] as "nano with better shortcuts", but it was always a bit of an overkill, so I'm really happy with this change. One quirk that remains: even with --modernbindings, Ctrl+X and Ctrl+C will add to nano's clipboard, instead of replacing whatever is there. [0] https://micro-editor.github.io. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Modeless Vim
    Is Micro[0] not a better, more purpose-fit solution to these issues? (Syntax highlighting quality, etc) Prev discussed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37171294. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache ActiveMQ and Micro, you can also consider the following products

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Vis - A vi-like editor based on Plan 9's structural regular expressions.

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

Neovim - Vim's rebirth for the 21st century

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

JOE - JOE is a full featured terminal-based screen editor which is distributed under the GNU General...

Loading...