Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache ActiveMQ VS Hangfire

Compare Apache ActiveMQ VS Hangfire and see what are their differences

Apache ActiveMQ logo Apache ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.

Hangfire logo Hangfire

An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.
  • Apache ActiveMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01
  • Hangfire Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04

Apache ActiveMQ features and specs

  • Open Source
    ActiveMQ is open-source under the Apache License, making it free to use and modify. This can lead to cost savings compared to commercial solutions.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    ActiveMQ supports multiple messaging protocols, including AMQP, MQTT, OpenWire, Stomp, and others, allowing for flexible integration with various systems and applications.
  • Java Integration
    Written in Java, ActiveMQ integrates well with JVM-based applications and other Apache projects like Camel and Karaf, making it a good fit for Java-centric environments.
  • High Availability
    Features like broker clustering, network of brokers, and failover support provide robust high availability options, ensuring message delivery even in case of failures.
  • Performance and Scalability
    ActiveMQ can handle a large number of messages and users by scaling horizontally, making it suitable for both small and enterprise-level applications.
  • Admin Console
    ActiveMQ provides a web-based admin console for easy management and monitoring of the message broker, simplifying administrative tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Apache ActiveMQ

  • Complex Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for newcomers. It often requires a steep learning curve to understand all the available options and optimizations.
  • Resource Intensive
    ActiveMQ can be resource-intensive, particularly in high-throughput scenarios, which may necessitate more robust hardware for optimal performance.
  • Latency
    In certain configurations, ActiveMQ may exhibit higher latency compared to other brokers, which might not make it suitable for use cases requiring real-time guarantees.
  • Java Dependency
    As a Java-based solution, ActiveMQ requires the JVM, which can be a downside for organizations that have standardized on other technology stacks.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around ActiveMQ, it may not be as large or as active as those for other, similar open-source projects. This can lead to slower responses to issues and fewer community-based resources.
  • Documentation
    Though comprehensive, the documentation can sometimes be difficult to navigate, making it challenging for users to find specific information quickly.

Hangfire features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Hangfire offers a simple and straightforward setup, allowing developers to quickly implement background processing without extensive configuration.
  • Reliable Background Processing
    It ensures reliable and persistent task execution, meaning tasks will not be lost in server restarts or crashes, thanks to its persistent storage options.
  • Dashboard Monitoring
    Hangfire comes with a built-in dashboard that provides a real-time view of all running jobs, their status, and history, aiding in monitoring and debugging.
  • Scalability
    It supports horizontal scaling by allowing multiple servers to process the queue, ensuring that load can be distributed effectively.
  • Flexibility with Recurring Jobs
    Hangfire offers flexible scheduling options for recurring jobs, similar to CRON jobs, allowing for different time intervals and complex scheduling scenarios.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, Hangfire allows for community contributions, bug fixes, and improvements, as well as customization by developers.

Possible disadvantages of Hangfire

  • Database Dependency
    Hangfire requires a database to store jobs and their statuses, which might lead to additional infrastructure and maintenance overhead.
  • Limited Language Support
    Hangfire is built specifically for .NET applications, which limits its use to developers working within the .NET ecosystem.
  • Complex Scaling Scenarios
    While scalable, implementing Hangfire in very large or complex deployments can require intricate setup and configuration, especially around job storage and processing.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    The dependency on a database for storing job states and potential contention on the background job processing can sometimes introduce performance overhead.
  • Licensing Costs
    For extended features and professional support, Hangfire offers commercial licenses, which may introduce additional costs beyond the open-source version.

Apache ActiveMQ videos

No Apache ActiveMQ videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Hangfire videos

AK 47 Wasr Hangfire - shooter beware

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache ActiveMQ and Hangfire)
Data Integration
64 64%
36% 36
Stream Processing
63 63%
37% 37
Web Service Automation
69 69%
31% 31
Business & Commerce
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache ActiveMQ and Hangfire. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache ActiveMQ and Hangfire

Apache ActiveMQ Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
ActiveMQ is a flexible, open-source, multi-protocol messaging broker that supports many protocols. This makes it easy for developers to use a variety of languages and platforms. The AMQP protocol facilitates integration with many applications based on different platforms. However, ActiveMQ’s high-end data accessibility capabilities are complemented by its load balancing,...
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
It is a managed information broker for Apache ActiveMQ which has simple installation and it runs message broker in cloud. It doesn’t need any special look after regular management and maintenance of the message system. It is utilized to send bulk message services.
Source: gokicker.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
Apache ActiveMQ is a popular, open-source, flexible multi-protocol messaging broker. Since it has great support for industry-based protocols, developers get access to languages and platforms. It helps in connecting clients written in languages like Python, C, C++, JavaScript, etc. With the help of the AMQP protocol, integration with many applications with different platforms...

Hangfire Reviews

We have no reviews of Hangfire yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Apache ActiveMQ might be a bit more popular than Hangfire. We know about 7 links to it since March 2021 and only 5 links to Hangfire. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache ActiveMQ mentions (7)

View more

Hangfire mentions (5)

  • Do I need message queues for sending emails/texts via services like SendGrid, AWS SES, Twilio etc.? How do you decide if you need message queues or not? What questions do you ask yourself?
    Hangfire (https://hangfire.io) includes default exception handling and is very extensible, I think it's a good mid-level choice and a good alternative to other queue mechanism, if you can't afford to host a separated queue service or can't manage a separated service; also scales pretty well (you can have multiple servers handling the same background job queue, or different queues). It runs on Sql Server and MySql... Source: almost 3 years ago
  • jsonb in postgres and should I use it or not?
    I used to just use hangfire.io in .net and worked wonderfully for any long running tasks or schedules. Had a great queuing system, UI to know if they failed , etc. That's how I'd send emails, pdf's, and other things along that nature. Then if it were more just a db related operation, just setup a schedule in mssql job service. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • How can In make a function run at a certain date in the future?
    You can use hangfire for cronjob, to run at a time in future, you can use Hangfire.Schedule(jobid, datetime). Source: almost 3 years ago
  • How to handle processing of an entity through different states?
    So another option is to use something like https://hangfire.io to pull the jobs and process them? Source: about 3 years ago
  • How to update database in a Parallel.For loop?
    I've got a fairly large process I need to handle in background on my .net core web app so I've exported it to a background task using Hangfire. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache ActiveMQ and Hangfire, you can also consider the following products

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Sidekiq - Sidekiq is a simple, efficient framework for background job processing in Ruby

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

Resque - Resque is a Redis-backed Ruby library for creating background jobs, placing them on multiple queues, and processing them later.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Enqueue It - Easy and scalable solution for manage and execute background tasks seamlessly in .NET applications. It allows you to schedule, queue, and process your jobs and microservices efficiently.