Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Ansible Semaphore VS Open-AudIT

Compare Ansible Semaphore VS Open-AudIT and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Ansible Semaphore logo Ansible Semaphore

Modern UI for Ansible

Open-AudIT logo Open-AudIT

Open-AudIT is a network auditing application.
  • Ansible Semaphore Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-09

If your project has grown and deploying from the terminal is no longer for you then Ansible Semaphore is what you need.

  • Open-AudIT Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-25

Ansible Semaphore features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Ansible Semaphore provides a web-based graphical interface that simplifies workflow management and task automation, making it accessible for users who prefer visual tools over command-line interfaces.
  • Integration with Ansible
    It integrates seamlessly with Ansible, allowing users to utilize Ansible's powerful automation capabilities while providing additional features like role-based access control and project management.
  • Role-Based Access Control
    Supports role-based access control (RBAC), enabling organizations to manage permissions and access to projects and resources efficiently, enhancing security and collaboration.
  • Improved Collaboration
    Facilitates better collaboration among team members by providing a centralized platform for managing playbooks, logs, and automation tasks.
  • Automation Scheduling
    Allows users to schedule automation tasks easily, streamlining regular maintenance tasks and ensuring consistency and reliability across deployments.

Possible disadvantages of Ansible Semaphore

  • Limited Scalability
    While suitable for small to medium-scale environments, Ansible Semaphore might not scale effectively for very large infrastructures without performance issues.
  • Feature Limitations
    Compared to other enterprise-level automation tools, it may lack some advanced features, integrations, or customizability options that larger organizations require.
  • Dependency on Ansible
    Since it relies heavily on Ansible, any limitations or bugs in Ansible can directly affect the functionality and reliability of Ansible Semaphore.
  • Community Support
    As an open-source project, Ansible Semaphore may have limited formal support and relies on community contributions and documentation, which might not be as comprehensive as commercial products.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    Some users may find the initial setup and configuration process complex, particularly if they are new to Ansible or automation tools in general.

Open-AudIT features and specs

  • Comprehensive Asset Discovery
    Open-AudIT provides extensive asset discovery capabilities, allowing organizations to automatically detect and manage devices on their network, leading to improved inventory management.
  • Open Source Flexibility
    Being open-source, Open-AudIT allows users to modify the software to fit their specific needs, offering high customization and community-driven enhancements.
  • Cost-Effective
    With its open-source nature, Open-AudIT can be a cost-effective solution for IT asset management, especially suitable for organizations with limited budgets.
  • Detailed Reporting
    The tool offers robust reporting features, enabling detailed insights into hardware and software configurations across the network, which aids in compliance and decision-making.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Open-AudIT supports various operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS, providing flexibility in managing diverse environments.

Possible disadvantages of Open-AudIT

  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup and configuration of Open-AudIT can be complex and time-consuming, potentially requiring advanced technical skills to properly implement.
  • Limited Support
    As an open-source project, Open-AudIT may have limited official support, primarily relying on community forums which can lead to slower resolution times for issues.
  • User Interface
    The user interface of Open-AudIT is considered less intuitive compared to some commercial alternatives, which might affect ease of use for less technical users.
  • Scalability Concerns
    While suitable for small to medium-sized environments, Open-AudIT may face scalability challenges when deployed in very large or complex networks.
  • Custom Features Development
    Although the software can be modified, developing complex custom features may require significant time and coding expertise, which might not be feasible for all users.

Ansible Semaphore videos

Ansible Semaphore - Modern Ansible UI

Open-AudIT videos

Webinar - Open-AudIT Top 10 Features and Functions Your Team Needs

More videos:

  • Review - Open-AudIT - Introducing Discovery Options
  • Review - Open-AudIT - Introduction

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ansible Semaphore and Open-AudIT)
DevOps Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Continuous Integration
100 100%
0% 0
IT Asset Management
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Ansible Semaphore and Open-AudIT.

What makes your product unique?

Ansible Semaphore's answer

Easy to install, easy to setup, easy to use.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Ansible Semaphore's answer

Easy to install, easy to setup, easy to use.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Ansible Semaphore's answer

Golang, Vue.js, BoltDB

User comments

Share your experience with using Ansible Semaphore and Open-AudIT. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Ansible Semaphore and Open-AudIT

Ansible Semaphore Reviews

  1. fiftin
    · Developer at Fastlix ·
    Lightweight alternative for AWX

    Use Semaphore 3+ years, very stable, useful and lightweight. No need Docker.

    🏁 Competitors: AWX, RunDeck

Open-AudIT Reviews

We have no reviews of Open-AudIT yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ansible Semaphore seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ansible Semaphore mentions (2)

  • Need User interface for managing and running the ansible playbooks.
    Once you have tower or awx you can throw away jenkins. No more silliness of groovy and java when you have python and ssh based actions For UI try Semaphore - https://github.com/ansible-semaphore/semaphore. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Automatic softwaredeployment & installation/updating Tool
    Googled and found this: https://github.com/ansible-semaphore/semaphore. Source: over 3 years ago

Open-AudIT mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Open-AudIT yet. Tracking of Open-AudIT recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ansible Semaphore and Open-AudIT, you can also consider the following products

RunDeck - RunDeck is an open source automation service with a web console, command line tools and a WebAPI.

Lansweeper - Lansweeper discovers Windows, Linux and Mac machines in your network.

AWX - Centralize and control your IT infrastructure with a visual dashboard

GLPI - GLPI is the Information Resource-Manager with an additional Administration- Interface.

Foreman - Foreman is an open source project that helps system administrators manage servers throughout their...

Snipe-IT - Managing assets with a Google doc or a shared Excel spreadsheet is more common than you think.