Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Ansible Semaphore VS AWX

Compare Ansible Semaphore VS AWX and see what are their differences

This page does not exist

Ansible Semaphore logo Ansible Semaphore

Modern UI for Ansible

AWX logo AWX

Centralize and control your IT infrastructure with a visual dashboard
  • Ansible Semaphore Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-09

If your project has grown and deploying from the terminal is no longer for you then Ansible Semaphore is what you need.

  • AWX Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-15

Ansible Semaphore features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Ansible Semaphore provides a web-based graphical interface that simplifies workflow management and task automation, making it accessible for users who prefer visual tools over command-line interfaces.
  • Integration with Ansible
    It integrates seamlessly with Ansible, allowing users to utilize Ansible's powerful automation capabilities while providing additional features like role-based access control and project management.
  • Role-Based Access Control
    Supports role-based access control (RBAC), enabling organizations to manage permissions and access to projects and resources efficiently, enhancing security and collaboration.
  • Improved Collaboration
    Facilitates better collaboration among team members by providing a centralized platform for managing playbooks, logs, and automation tasks.
  • Automation Scheduling
    Allows users to schedule automation tasks easily, streamlining regular maintenance tasks and ensuring consistency and reliability across deployments.

Possible disadvantages of Ansible Semaphore

  • Limited Scalability
    While suitable for small to medium-scale environments, Ansible Semaphore might not scale effectively for very large infrastructures without performance issues.
  • Feature Limitations
    Compared to other enterprise-level automation tools, it may lack some advanced features, integrations, or customizability options that larger organizations require.
  • Dependency on Ansible
    Since it relies heavily on Ansible, any limitations or bugs in Ansible can directly affect the functionality and reliability of Ansible Semaphore.
  • Community Support
    As an open-source project, Ansible Semaphore may have limited formal support and relies on community contributions and documentation, which might not be as comprehensive as commercial products.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    Some users may find the initial setup and configuration process complex, particularly if they are new to Ansible or automation tools in general.

AWX features and specs

  • Open Source
    AWX is an open-source project, meaning it is free to use and has a community-driven development model. This allows for transparency, community support, and the flexibility to adapt the software to specific needs.
  • Integration with Ansible
    AWX is closely integrated with Ansible, providing a web-based user interface to manage Ansible playbooks, inventories, and scheduling jobs. This enhances the usability and accessibility of Ansible's powerful automation capabilities.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The graphical user interface allows users to manage their playbooks and nodes easily without requiring deep command-line skills, making it accessible for users who prefer visual tools over CLI.
  • Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)
    AWX provides RBAC, enabling organizations to control user permissions and ensure that only authorized personnel can execute certain tasks, enhancing security and compliance.
  • Scalability
    AWX supports scaling out operations across infrastructures, making it suitable for managing a growing number of nodes and playbooks in large environments.

Possible disadvantages of AWX

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up AWX can be complex, requiring significant configuration and understanding of both Ansible and containerized environments, which might be challenging for new users.
  • Resource Intensive
    AWX can be resource-intensive, requiring considerable computational resources and infrastructure, which may not be ideal for smaller or resource-constrained environments.
  • Limited Support
    As an open-source project, AWX does not come with official support from Red Hat. Users may have to rely on community support which can vary in responsiveness and depth.
  • Frequent Updates
    Being a rapidly evolving project, AWX receives frequent updates, which might require organizations to continually adjust their configurations and workflows to remain up-to-date.
  • Learning Curve
    For users not already familiar with Ansible, there can be a steep learning curve to understand how AWX integrates with Ansible and how to properly use its features.

Ansible Semaphore videos

Ansible Semaphore - Modern Ansible UI

AWX videos

$AWX STOCK REVIEW - BY TREND LINE KING EL DORADO

More videos:

  • Review - Samson Airline AWX Wireless Microphone Unboxing and Review
  • Demo - Ansible AWX Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ansible Semaphore and AWX)
DevOps Tools
47 47%
53% 53
Continuous Integration
47 47%
53% 53
IT Automation
51 51%
49% 49
Continuous Deployment
47 47%
53% 53

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Ansible Semaphore and AWX.

What makes your product unique?

Ansible Semaphore's answer

Easy to install, easy to setup, easy to use.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Ansible Semaphore's answer

Easy to install, easy to setup, easy to use.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Ansible Semaphore's answer

Golang, Vue.js, BoltDB

User comments

Share your experience with using Ansible Semaphore and AWX. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Ansible Semaphore and AWX

Ansible Semaphore Reviews

  1. fiftin
    · Developer at Fastlix ·
    Lightweight alternative for AWX

    Use Semaphore 3+ years, very stable, useful and lightweight. No need Docker.

    🏁 Competitors: AWX, RunDeck

AWX Reviews

We have no reviews of AWX yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ansible Semaphore seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ansible Semaphore mentions (2)

  • Need User interface for managing and running the ansible playbooks.
    Once you have tower or awx you can throw away jenkins. No more silliness of groovy and java when you have python and ssh based actions For UI try Semaphore - https://github.com/ansible-semaphore/semaphore. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Automatic softwaredeployment & installation/updating Tool
    Googled and found this: https://github.com/ansible-semaphore/semaphore. Source: over 3 years ago

AWX mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of AWX yet. Tracking of AWX recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ansible Semaphore and AWX, you can also consider the following products

RunDeck - RunDeck is an open source automation service with a web console, command line tools and a WebAPI.

Foreman - Foreman is an open source project that helps system administrators manage servers throughout their...

Ansible tower - An ansible web frontend.

Semaphore - Semaphore is a fully managed, high performance testing and deployment solution for your company. A Continuous Integration tool.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Polemarch - Polemarch is service for orchestration infrastructure by ansible.