AmorphousDiskMark VS fio

Compare AmorphousDiskMark VS fio and see what are their differences

Cyclr

Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

AmorphousDiskMark

AmorphousDiskMark measures storage read/write performance in MB/s and IOPS.

fio

Generate I/O for benchmarking, stress testing, verification or workload reproduction purposes.

Landing page //
2022-10-10

Landing page //
2023-09-15

AmorphousDiskMark

Website: katsurashareware.com

Edit details

AmorphousDiskMark features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

fio features and specs

Highly Flexible
Fio is highly configurable, allowing users to simulate various types of workloads with detailed parameters. This flexibility makes it suitable for a wide range of performance testing scenarios, including block devices, files, and networked filesystems.
Cross-Platform Compatibility
Fio is designed to work on multiple operating systems, including Linux, Windows, and macOS. This cross-platform support enhances its usability in diverse environments and facilitates testing across different systems.
Rich Feature Set
Fio supports a multitude of I/O engines, including sync, mmap, libaio, posixaio, and others. Additionally, it allows for dynamic generation of patterns, scripting via functions, and varied reporting formats, which are ideal for comprehensive performance analysis.
Active Development and Support
Being an open-source tool with a large community, fio receives regular updates and improvements from contributors, ensuring that it remains robust and relevant for modern testing needs.
Detailed Reporting
Fio provides detailed and customizable output formats, such as JSON and normal text, which help users analyze performance metrics in depth and facilitate easy integration into performance testing workflows.

Possible disadvantages of fio

Complexity for Beginners
The extensive configuration options, while powerful, can be overwhelming for new users. It may take time and effort to learn how to effectively use fio and interpret its results without prior experience in performance testing.
Limited GUI Support
Fio primarily operates from the command line, lacking a native graphical user interface (GUI). This can limit its accessibility for users who prefer visual tools and may require additional tooling or scripts for enhanced usability.
Resource-Intensive
Running fio with complex workloads or on large-scale systems can be resource-intensive, potentially affecting other processes on the test system. Users need to ensure that appropriate resources are available to avoid skewed test results.
Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
For users seeking to employ advanced features like custom scripting or network testing, understanding the full scope of fio's capabilities and configuration syntax can be challenging without comprehensive documentation or community support.

AmorphousDiskMark videos

+ Add

AmorphousDiskMark ver.1.00 download & install

fio videos

+ Add

MAZAYA CHAMBRA FIO | Review [+18]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AmorphousDiskMark and fio)

fio

Hard Drive Tools

20 20%

Hard Drive Tools

80% 80

Monitoring Tools

19 19%

Monitoring Tools

81% 81

Utilities

19 19%

Utilities

81% 81

Web Service Automation

25 25%

Web Service Automation

75% 75

User comments

Share your experience with using AmorphousDiskMark and fio. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, fio seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 14 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AmorphousDiskMark mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of AmorphousDiskMark yet. Tracking of AmorphousDiskMark recommendations started around Mar 2021.

fio mentions (14)

Dire SMB speed with on PC to NAS
Assuming two systems use flash storage, network bandwidth is identical and it is configured the same way, there should be an issue within the PC, either system or storage drive. Check the system logs for errors and warning events related to data transfer from/to NAS. Try to benchmark the PCs' disks using fio to confirm they have similar performance. https://github.com/axboe/fio. Source: almost 2 years ago
Ask HN: What are some good resources for learning about low level disk/file IO?
Not specifically addressing your question, but when you get to the point of wanting to start doing some experiments you may find that 'fio' [1] is very handy. [1] https://github.com/axboe/fio. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
KVM virtual machines on ZFS benchmarks
The dd is not a good benchmarking tool, you should use something like fio and probably tune it to use the ioengine most similar to your use case (eg. a database server will probably use some async IO interface). In your first example (with bs=1G) probably something (the guest OS, the qemu/kvm or the host OS) have split into smaller chunks anyway. Source: about 2 years ago
SSD Sequential Write Slowdowns
All linux tests are run with fio 3.32 (github) with future commit 03900b0bf8af625bb43b10f0627b3c5947c3ff79 manually applied. Source: over 2 years ago
Just write the f*****g parser.
Agree, I used flex/yacc to add an arithmetic expression evaluator to fio a few years back to allow simple math with some units in fio's job files, and for stuff like that, they're fine, but I wouldn't want to use them for a real language, the error handling is kind of a nightmare. Source: over 2 years ago