Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Amazon SNS VS Microsoft Azure Service Bus

Compare Amazon SNS VS Microsoft Azure Service Bus and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Amazon SNS logo Amazon SNS

Fully managed pub/sub messaging for microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications

Microsoft Azure Service Bus logo Microsoft Azure Service Bus

Microsoft Azure Service Bus offers cloud messaging service between applications and services.
  • Amazon SNS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-21
  • Microsoft Azure Service Bus Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-05

Amazon SNS features and specs

  • Scalable
    Amazon SNS can handle a high-throughput of messages, making it suitable for large-scale applications.
  • Flexible
    Supports multiple message delivery formats and protocols, including HTTP/S, SQS, Lambda, SMS, and email.
  • Easy Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with various AWS services such as EC2, S3, and Lambda, simplifying the overall architecture.
  • Real-time Notifications
    Provides near-instantaneous notifications, ideal for time-sensitive applications.
  • Reliability
    Offers high availability and durability, ensuring that messages are reliably delivered.
  • Cost-effective
    Pay-as-you-go pricing model can be cost-effective for various use cases.
  • Security Features
    Supports fine-grained access control and encryption to ensure secure message delivery.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon SNS

  • Complexity
    May require a learning curve to fully understand and configure, particularly for those not familiar with AWS services.
  • Potential Latency
    Message delivery can occasionally have latency issues, particularly over less reliable network connections.
  • Limited Message Size
    SNS has a limit of 256KB per message, which may be restrictive for certain use cases.
  • Cost Overhead
    While it can be cost-effective, costs can accumulate with high volume and usage, especially if you are not optimizing your resources.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Using SNS ties you to the AWS ecosystem, which might be a disadvantage if you are looking for a multi-cloud or cloud-agnostic solution.
  • Limited Protocols for Direct Communication
    Although several protocols are supported, certain specific or legacy protocols may not be directly compatible.

Microsoft Azure Service Bus features and specs

  • Reliable Messaging
    Azure Service Bus ensures reliable message delivery with features like message duplication detection, guaranteed delivery, and message ordering.
  • Advanced Security
    It offers robust security features including Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), Azure AD integration, and data encryption both in transit and at rest.
  • Scalability
    Service Bus can scale dynamically to handle varying loads and support a large number of concurrent connections.
  • Message Queuing and Publish/Subscribe Patterns
    Supports both traditional queuing and publish/subscribe mechanisms, providing flexibility in how messages are sent and processed.
  • Integration with Azure Services
    Easily integrates with other Azure services like Azure Functions, Logic Apps, and Event Grid, enhancing workflow automation and system orchestration.
  • Hybrid Connectivity
    Allows for seamless communication across on-premises and cloud environments, facilitating hybrid cloud architectures.

Possible disadvantages of Microsoft Azure Service Bus

  • Complex Pricing Model
    Azure Service Bus pricing can be complex, making it difficult for users to estimate costs accurately, especially with various tiers and features.
  • Learning Curve
    Users new to Azure Service Bus might find it challenging initially due to the extensive range of configurations and features.
  • Potential Latency
    While generally reliable, there can be latency issues, particularly in high-volume scenarios or if improperly configured.
  • Limited Support for Non-Azure Environments
    Azure Service Bus is primarily designed for use within the Azure ecosystem, which can make it less suitable for enterprises relying heavily on other cloud providers.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity
    Being a cloud service means reliance on stable internet connections, which can be a point of failure in regions with connectivity issues.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Amazon SNS and Microsoft Azure Service Bus)
Push Notifications
100 100%
0% 0
Stream Processing
58 58%
42% 42
Web Push Notifications
100 100%
0% 0
Data Integration
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Amazon SNS and Microsoft Azure Service Bus. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Amazon SNS and Microsoft Azure Service Bus

Amazon SNS Reviews

6 Best Notification Infrastructure for Modern Applications
Lastly, let’s not forget Simple Notification Service by Amazon, a web service that supports application-to-application (A2A) and application-to-person (A2P) communication between distributed environments, microservices, and event-driven serverless applications.
Source: geekflare.com

Microsoft Azure Service Bus Reviews

We have no reviews of Microsoft Azure Service Bus yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon SNS seems to be a lot more popular than Microsoft Azure Service Bus. While we know about 55 links to Amazon SNS, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Microsoft Azure Service Bus. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Amazon SNS mentions (55)

  • Event-Driven Architecture on AWS
    Event Routers: Services like Amazon SQS (A managed message queuing), Amazon SNS (A pub/sub messaging), AWS Step Functions (An orchestrate serverless workflows) and Amazon EventBridge (A serverless event bus) act as event routers, establishing the paths and flow for messages within the architecture. They enable seamless handling and distribution of events, ensuring that each message reaches its intended destination... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Serverless Site Health Check Notification System
    This blog details how you can use some key serverless components from AWS like Amazon Eventbridge, AWS Lambda, and Simple Notification Service to setup a system that will monitor your site (which can be running anywhere) and send emails, text messages, slack messages, and more when the reachability status of your site changes. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • WebSockets, gRPC, MQTT, and SSE - Which Real-Time Notification Method Is For You?
    Compare this to a stateless communication mechanism like Amazon SNS or other Webhook implementation where the connection is not persistent and the communication is one-way. These are intended to be used as a response to an event and inform subscribers without maintaining a continuous connection or keeping memory of previous interactions. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Programmatically reacting to S3 bucket external access exposures
    Let's make it simple and add an SNS topic target to the rule. We can add multiple different subscribers to the topic. Any time when Access Analyzer creates a new finding, SNS can, for example, send an email or a customized Slack message. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Receiving Slack notifications when CloudTrail logging gets turned off
    Of course, Slack is not the only way to receive notifications. EventBridge integrates with many target services, both AWS and 3rd parties. For example, we can set up email or phone text message alerts in SNS, or add a different target if business needs require. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

Microsoft Azure Service Bus mentions (3)

  • Top 6 message queues for distributed architectures
    Microsoft Azure Service Bus is a reliable, fully managed Cloud service for delivering messages via queues or topics. It has a free and paid tier. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Managing the infrastructure of a reusable ecommerce platform with Terraform
    Our team uses Azure as our cloud provider to manage all those resources. Every service uses different resources related to the business logic they handle. We use resources like Azure Service Bus to handle the asynchronous communication between them and Azure Key Vault to store the secrets and environment variables. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • Setting up demos in Azure - Part 1: ARM templates
    For event infrastructure, we have a bunch of options, like Azure Service Bus, Azure Event Grid and Azure Event Hubs. Like the databases, they aren't mutually exclusive and I could use all, depending on the circumstance, but to keep things simple, I'll pick one and move on. Right now I'm more inclined towards Event Hubs, as it works similarly to Apache Kafka, which is a good fit for the presentation context. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Amazon SNS and Microsoft Azure Service Bus, you can also consider the following products

Amazon SQS - Amazon Simple Queue Service is a fully managed message queuing service.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

OneSignal - Customer engagement platform used by over 1 million developers and marketers; the fastest and most reliable way to send mobile and web push notifications, in-app messages, emails, and SMS.

Hangfire - An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.