Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Amazon FSx for Lustre VS Baby FTP Server

Compare Amazon FSx for Lustre VS Baby FTP Server and see what are their differences

Sup! Standup Bot
The complete stand-up and follow-up bot featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Amazon FSx for Lustre logo Amazon FSx for Lustre

Fully managed Lustre file system for compute-intensive workloads like high performance (HPC) and machine learning (ML).

Baby FTP Server logo Baby FTP Server

The simplest FTP server to setup. No authentication required.
  • Amazon FSx for Lustre Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-05
  • Baby FTP Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-01

Amazon FSx for Lustre videos

+ Add

Amazon FSx for Lustre: Persistent Storage Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Amazon FSx for Lustre - AWS Online Tech Talks

Baby FTP Server videos

No Baby FTP Server videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Amazon FSx for Lustre and Baby FTP Server)

Amazon FSx for Lustre

Baby FTP Server

Cloud Storage
100 100%
Cloud Storage
0% 0
FTP Client
17 17%
FTP Client
83% 83
Project Management
100 100%
Project Management
0% 0
File Transfer
0 0%
File Transfer
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Amazon FSx for Lustre and Baby FTP Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon FSx for Lustre seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Amazon FSx for Lustre mentions (2)

  • Mountpoint – file client for S3 written in Rust, from AWS
    I think theres an interesting story in software ecosystems where there are two flavors of applications (which coexist) that prefer object stores over filesystems and vice versa. Good reference point for this I think exists in many modern video transcoding infrastructures. Using something like FSx [1] gives you a performant option for the use cases when the tooling involved prefers filesystem semantics. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Will ChatGPT replace Google Search Now
    Amazon FSx for Lustre high-performance Storage with Amazon EC2 Trn1 instances, powered by AWS Trainium accelerators, are purpose built for high-performance (DL) training while offering up to 50% cost-to-train savings over comparable GPU-based instances. Trn1 instance supports up to 800 Gbps of Elastic Fabric Adapter networking bandwidth. Each Trn1 instance also supports up to 80 Gbps of Amazon Elastic Block Store... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Baby FTP Server mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Baby FTP Server yet. Tracking of Baby FTP Server recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Amazon FSx for Lustre and Baby FTP Server, you can also consider the following products

Azure File Storage - Try Azure File Storage for managed file shares that use standard SMB 3.0 protocol. Share data with on-premises and cloud servers, integrate with apps, and more.

FileZilla Server - Download FileZilla Server 0.9.60.2 for Windows

Google Cloud Resource Manager - Resource Manager provides methods that you can use to programmatically manage your projects on Google Cloud Platform.

vsftpd - Very secure FTP Daemon, a secure, fast FTP server for UNIX systems, including Linux.

Google Cloud Filestore - Fully-managed cloud file storage

ProFTPD - The Official ProFTPD web site. ProFTPD is a high-performance, extremely configurable, and most of all a secure FTP server, featuring Apache-like configuration and blazing performance.

Loading...