Google App Engine might be a bit more popular than Amazon Elastic File System. We know about 26 links to it since March 2021 and only 22 links to Amazon Elastic File System. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
AWS EFS is a managed shared storage solution in the cloud that is compatible with NFS. In our three-tier architecture, it sits in the data layer and provides shared storage for the application tier servers. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
But that didn't work quite so well. Between some issues with the packages, and the amount of time it took to unzip... It just wasn't worth it. So I refactored back into using EFS to host the packages and model files. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
AWS EFS is a fully managed, highly scalable shared storage solution in the cloud. It is NFS compatible. This Elastic filesystem will provide shared storage for all our application tier servers. Since it provides storage, EFS sits in the data layer of the three tier architecture. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) is a managed Network File System (NFS) designed for Linux-based EC2 instances, selected AWS managed services, and on-premise servers. There’s a similar storage system for Windows hosts called the Amazon FSx for Windows File Server. FSx uses the Server Message Block (SMB) protocol while EFS uses NFS. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Amazon EFS, Amazon RDS Proxy, Amazon Aurora Serverless, Amazon Redshift Serverless, Amazon Neptune Serverless This is my serverless database catch-all section. In my opinion, S3 and DynamoDB are really the storage solutions you need for serverless development, however, you may find some use cases for these remaining serverless storage options. EFS is the Elastic File System, which automagically sizes for the... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
In 2008, Google launched AppEngine. This product predates the formal existence of Google Cloud and can be considered Google Cloud's first offering. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
To deploy the app, we can use Google Cloud App Engine, which is specifically built for server-side rendered websites. After we create a new project in the Google Cloud Console, we have to configure the cql-trace-viewer application. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
I've read that article, but I'm thinking there are other better (and most importantly cheaper) ways of doing that, such as using App Engine (given that you have to mitigate the maximum request timeout and to make sure there are constantly exactly 1 instance running). Source: about 1 year ago
Shout out to GCP App Engine for deploying anode/Express severe. Source: about 1 year ago
If your project is a bit more complicated using next.js or react.js or angular.js, you may find some free Platfrom-as-a-Service%20is%20a%20complete%20cloud%20environment,middleware%2C%20tools%2C%20and%20more.). I have seen some of my peers using free PaaS like Heroku, Vercel and I have no experience in using PaaS but I will recommend you to use PaaS from either of the three 1. Google Cloud's Google App Engine 2.... Source: about 1 year ago
Azure File Storage - Try Azure File Storage for managed file shares that use standard SMB 3.0 protocol. Share data with on-premises and cloud servers, integrate with apps, and more.
Salesforce Platform - Salesforce Platform is a comprehensive PaaS solution that paves the way for the developers to test, build, and mitigate the issues in the cloud application before the final deployment.
Google Cloud Filestore - Fully-managed cloud file storage
Dokku - Docker powered mini-Heroku in around 100 lines of Bash
WinSCP - WinSCP is an open source free SFTP client and FTP client for Windows.
Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.