AWS EFS is a managed shared storage solution in the cloud that is compatible with NFS. In our three-tier architecture, it sits in the data layer and provides shared storage for the application tier servers. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago

But that didn't work quite so well. Between some issues with the packages, and the amount of time it took to unzip... It just wasn't worth it. So I refactored back into using EFS to host the packages and model files. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago

AWS EFS is a fully managed, highly scalable shared storage solution in the cloud. It is NFS compatible. This Elastic filesystem will provide shared storage for all our application tier servers. Since it provides storage, EFS sits in the data layer of the three tier architecture. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) is a managed Network File System (NFS) designed for Linux-based EC2 instances, selected AWS managed services, and on-premise servers. There’s a similar storage system for Windows hosts called the Amazon FSx for Windows File Server. FSx uses the Server Message Block (SMB) protocol while EFS uses NFS. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

Amazon EFS, Amazon RDS Proxy, Amazon Aurora Serverless, Amazon Redshift Serverless, Amazon Neptune Serverless This is my serverless database catch-all section. In my opinion, S3 and DynamoDB are really the storage solutions you need for serverless development, however, you may find some use cases for these remaining serverless storage options. EFS is the Elastic File System, which automagically sizes for the... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

As far as the big players are concerned, Google offers AlloyDB (https://cloud.google.com/alloydb) while Amazon offers Aurora (https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/). - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

Aurora is a managed database service from Amazon compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL. It allows for the use of existing MySQL code, tools, and applications and can offer increased performance for certain workloads compared to MySQL and PostgreSQL. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago

See my other comment on this thread. More typically you'd use RDS for external DB. Aurora is a megascale version. Source: 12 months ago

If you get to a point where RDS cannot handle your work load you can migrate to Amazon Aurora: Https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/. Source: about 1 year ago

Just like how DB replication and load-balancers exists for ~20 years, SC is making far worse version of them under different name. So this "budget" thingy is just another distraction for cult to discuss, so the followers can claim "they know game development". Source: about 1 year ago