Based on our record, Amazon CloudFront seems to be a lot more popular than Keycloak. While we know about 69 links to Amazon CloudFront, we've tracked only 4 mentions of Keycloak. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
In this tutorial, I will walk you through building a quick static site by doing a static build using ReactJS & create-react-app, then show you how to deploy that static site on AWS using S3 buckets as well as how to cache it & add SSL certificates with CloudFront CDN & Certificate Manager. - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
The main stars for deploying WASM on S3 are CloudFront and of course S3. Those two services will do the heavy lifting with our compiled WASM distribution. - Source: dev.to / 19 days ago
CloudFront is a managed Content-Delivery Network (CDN). That is to say, it makes it possible to serve cached content (or not) from locations close to clients. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Add cache and edge servers to avoid unnecessary service load when possible (e.g.: cloudfront). - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
AWS CloudFront is a global content delivery network (CDN) that makes it easy to deliver websites, videos, apps, and APIs securely and at high speeds with low latency. You can use CloudFront to reduce latency by delivering data through 400+ globally dispersed Points of Presence (PoPs) and improve security with traffic encryption, access controls, and resiliency against DDoS attacks. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Most of the time nowadays, I prefer offloading this to an identity provider, using OpenID Connect or soon Federated Credential Management (FedCM), even if that means shipping an identity provider as part of the deliverables (I generally go with Keycloak, with keycloak-config-cli to provision its configuration). I'm obviously biased though as I work in IT services, developping software mainly for... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Yet another breach of Okta... Why are companies not running something like keycloak [1] themselves? Are administrative/maintenance costs too high or is it plausible deniability? [1] https://keycloak.org. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
I'd stick with a solution like https://keycloak.org in that instance. Source: about 1 year ago
A few more projects in this space: - Keycloak (you won't get fired for picking this)[0] - CloudFoundry's UAA[1] - Gluu [2] - Keratin [3] - OpenUnison [4] - Dex[5] - Netlify's GoTrue[6] All of these solutions are a bit different but here are some of the axes: - Whether or not they function as an OAuth provider - Whether they're centered around application-user-login (email + password) or application auth (OAuth) or... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
CloudFlare - Cloudflare is a global network designed to make everything you connect to the Internet secure, private, fast, and reliable.
Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.
KeyCDN - KeyCDN is a high-performance Content Delivery Network (CDN). Lowest price globally at $0.04/GB with HTTP/2 Support and free Origin Shield.
Okta - Enterprise-grade identity management for all your apps, users & devices
CDN77 - Content Delivery Network - website speed acceleration with CDN77. 28+ PoPs, Pay-as-you-go prices, no commitments.
OneLogin - On-demand SSO, directory integration, user provisioning and more