Amazon Aurora VS CrateIO

As far as the big players are concerned, Google offers AlloyDB (https://cloud.google.com/alloydb) while Amazon offers Aurora (https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/). - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Aurora is a managed database service from Amazon compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL. It allows for the use of existing MySQL code, tools, and applications and can offer increased performance for certain workloads compared to MySQL and PostgreSQL. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago

See my other comment on this thread. More typically you'd use RDS for external DB. Aurora is a megascale version. Source: 11 months ago

If you get to a point where RDS cannot handle your work load you can migrate to Amazon Aurora: Https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/. Source: about 1 year ago

Just like how DB replication and load-balancers exists for ~20 years, SC is making far worse version of them under different name. So this "budget" thingy is just another distraction for cult to discuss, so the followers can claim "they know game development". Source: about 1 year ago

CrateDB - Distributed Open Source SQL database for real-time analytics. Free Tier CRFREE: One-node with 2 CPUs, 2 GiB of memory, 8 GiB of storage. One cluster per organization, no payment method needed. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

Not necessarily argmin{}, but it appears as one of top download in crate.io. Again, that's just a suggestion. VarPar seems like a subset of bigger "optimization", but I might be wrong. I am not affiliated to argmin{} at all. I am still learning argmin{} and have not even get my first optimization to run properly. Do I want to learn new workflow again ... hmm.. A search in crate.io for "optimization" yield tons... Source: about 1 year ago

I really, really don't understand what the big deal with Rust is. I like to call Rust "LLVM's Python". It's a language for people who don't know how to debug segfaults lol. This is coming from me a person who loves Rust, despite all its faults, I believe if used as a low-level language, it can flourish to hell and back. But if you are going to use it as a webframework and load dozens of crate.io libraries on it,... Source: about 1 year ago

There's 3 more errors that amount to the same thing. So I run cargo update. Same result. Explicitly tried to update cfg-if then rand_core with --verbose and --aggressive. No output beyond "updating crate.io index." Checked in browser for updates. cfg-if had no new versions since 2018. Then I tried using cargo clean first. Same result. Source: about 1 year ago

However, I do say that my general points still holds: most user's composing their types will get the right defaults and if they need anything more exotic, the users and domain specialist can very easy coordinate via crate.io . Source: over 1 year ago