Amazon Aurora VS Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL

As far as the big players are concerned, Google offers AlloyDB (https://cloud.google.com/alloydb) while Amazon offers Aurora (https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/). - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Aurora is a managed database service from Amazon compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL. It allows for the use of existing MySQL code, tools, and applications and can offer increased performance for certain workloads compared to MySQL and PostgreSQL. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago

See my other comment on this thread. More typically you'd use RDS for external DB. Aurora is a megascale version. Source: 11 months ago

If you get to a point where RDS cannot handle your work load you can migrate to Amazon Aurora: Https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/. Source: about 1 year ago

Just like how DB replication and load-balancers exists for ~20 years, SC is making far worse version of them under different name. So this "budget" thingy is just another distraction for cult to discuss, so the followers can claim "they know game development". Source: about 1 year ago

Yay! We have now deployed our Django web application with ECS Service + Fargate on AWS. But now it works with SQLite file database. This file will be recreated on every service restart. So, our app cannot persist any data for now. In the next article we’ll connect Django to AWS RDS PostgreSQL. - Source: dev.to / 25 days ago

Today, AWS announces the general availability of pgactive: Active-active Replication Extension for PostgreSQL, available for Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) for PostgreSQL. Pgactive lets you use asynchronous active-active replication for streaming data between database instances to provide additional resiliency and flexibility in moving data between database instances, including writers located in... Source: 7 months ago

Best practice would definitely be setting up a separately hosted database (I swear I'm not an AWS shill) for production as this ensures much better data integrity. Plus it manages backups etc. For you. Source: 12 months ago

For Postgres I’d use RDS for Postgres and for your Node app well I mean you’ve got a plethora of options. Elastic Beanstalk, ECS, App Runner, EC2, etc. If you really want to go the 0 managed hardware approach I’d go with App Runner if your application is already containerized and if not then Elastic Beanstalk. Source: over 1 year ago

How cash strapped? Personally, I would just use something managed like AWS's RDS for PostgreSQL https://aws.amazon.com/rds/postgresql/ Then you don't need to worry too much about administrative tasks. As a bonus, you can start out small and easily scale as you grow, versus self-managed. It doesn't have to be AWS. You can find similar offerings from pretty much any cloud provider. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago