Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Amazon API Gateway VS Hangfire

Compare Amazon API Gateway VS Hangfire and see what are their differences

Amazon API Gateway logo Amazon API Gateway

Create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale

Hangfire logo Hangfire

An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.
  • Amazon API Gateway Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12
  • Hangfire Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04

Amazon API Gateway features and specs

  • Scalability
    API Gateway automatically scales to handle the number of requests your API receives, ensuring high availability and reliability.
  • Ease of Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like Lambda, DynamoDB, and IAM, enabling a cohesive environment for developing serverless applications.
  • Built-in Security
    Provides features such as IAM roles, API keys, and AWS WAF integration for safeguarding your APIs from potential threats.
  • Monitoring and Logging
    Supports CloudWatch integration for monitoring API requests and responses, helping you maintain observability and troubleshoot issues effectively.
  • Cost-Effective
    You only pay for the requests made to your APIs and the amount of data transferred out, making it a cost-effective solution for many use cases.
  • Caching
    Built-in caching at the API Gateway level can improve performance and reduce latency for frequently accessed data.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon API Gateway

  • Complexity in Configuration
    Setting up and managing API Gateway can be complex, especially for users who are not familiar with AWS services and cloud infrastructure.
  • Cold Start Latency
    When integrated with AWS Lambda, cold starts can introduce latency which can affect the performance of your API.
  • Cost for High Throughput
    While cost-effective for low to moderate usage, the costs can escalate with high throughput and large data transfers.
  • Debugging Issues
    Diagnosis can be complicated due to the multi-tenant nature of the service and the need to dive into multiple AWS logs and services.
  • Limited Customization
    There might be constraints regarding customizations and fine-tuning your APIs compared to self-hosting solutions.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Dependence on AWS infrastructure can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to migrate to other cloud providers or solutions.

Hangfire features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Hangfire offers a simple and straightforward setup, allowing developers to quickly implement background processing without extensive configuration.
  • Reliable Background Processing
    It ensures reliable and persistent task execution, meaning tasks will not be lost in server restarts or crashes, thanks to its persistent storage options.
  • Dashboard Monitoring
    Hangfire comes with a built-in dashboard that provides a real-time view of all running jobs, their status, and history, aiding in monitoring and debugging.
  • Scalability
    It supports horizontal scaling by allowing multiple servers to process the queue, ensuring that load can be distributed effectively.
  • Flexibility with Recurring Jobs
    Hangfire offers flexible scheduling options for recurring jobs, similar to CRON jobs, allowing for different time intervals and complex scheduling scenarios.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, Hangfire allows for community contributions, bug fixes, and improvements, as well as customization by developers.

Possible disadvantages of Hangfire

  • Database Dependency
    Hangfire requires a database to store jobs and their statuses, which might lead to additional infrastructure and maintenance overhead.
  • Limited Language Support
    Hangfire is built specifically for .NET applications, which limits its use to developers working within the .NET ecosystem.
  • Complex Scaling Scenarios
    While scalable, implementing Hangfire in very large or complex deployments can require intricate setup and configuration, especially around job storage and processing.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    The dependency on a database for storing job states and potential contention on the background job processing can sometimes introduce performance overhead.
  • Licensing Costs
    For extended features and professional support, Hangfire offers commercial licenses, which may introduce additional costs beyond the open-source version.

Amazon API Gateway videos

Building APIs with Amazon API Gateway

More videos:

  • Review - Create API using AWS API Gateway service - Amazon API Gateway p1

Hangfire videos

AK 47 Wasr Hangfire - shooter beware

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Amazon API Gateway and Hangfire)
API Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Data Integration
0 0%
100% 100
APIs
100 100%
0% 0
Stream Processing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Amazon API Gateway and Hangfire. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon API Gateway seems to be a lot more popular than Hangfire. While we know about 107 links to Amazon API Gateway, we've tracked only 5 mentions of Hangfire. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Amazon API Gateway mentions (107)

View more

Hangfire mentions (5)

  • Do I need message queues for sending emails/texts via services like SendGrid, AWS SES, Twilio etc.? How do you decide if you need message queues or not? What questions do you ask yourself?
    Hangfire (https://hangfire.io) includes default exception handling and is very extensible, I think it's a good mid-level choice and a good alternative to other queue mechanism, if you can't afford to host a separated queue service or can't manage a separated service; also scales pretty well (you can have multiple servers handling the same background job queue, or different queues). It runs on Sql Server and MySql... Source: almost 3 years ago
  • jsonb in postgres and should I use it or not?
    I used to just use hangfire.io in .net and worked wonderfully for any long running tasks or schedules. Had a great queuing system, UI to know if they failed , etc. That's how I'd send emails, pdf's, and other things along that nature. Then if it were more just a db related operation, just setup a schedule in mssql job service. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • How can In make a function run at a certain date in the future?
    You can use hangfire for cronjob, to run at a time in future, you can use Hangfire.Schedule(jobid, datetime). Source: about 3 years ago
  • How to handle processing of an entity through different states?
    So another option is to use something like https://hangfire.io to pull the jobs and process them? Source: about 3 years ago
  • How to update database in a Parallel.For loop?
    I've got a fairly large process I need to handle in background on my .net core web app so I've exported it to a background task using Hangfire. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Amazon API Gateway and Hangfire, you can also consider the following products

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

Sidekiq - Sidekiq is a simple, efficient framework for background job processing in Ruby

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service

Enqueue It - Easy and scalable solution for manage and execute background tasks seamlessly in .NET applications. It allows you to schedule, queue, and process your jobs and microservices efficiently.

Apigee - Intelligent and complete API platform

Resque - Resque is a Redis-backed Ruby library for creating background jobs, placing them on multiple queues, and processing them later.