Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AirBrake VS Google Stackdriver Error Reporting

Compare AirBrake VS Google Stackdriver Error Reporting and see what are their differences

AirBrake logo AirBrake

Airbrake is the leading exception reporting service, currently providing error tracking.

Google Stackdriver Error Reporting logo Google Stackdriver Error Reporting

Aggregates and displays errors produced by cloud services
  • AirBrake Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-17
  • Google Stackdriver Error Reporting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

AirBrake features and specs

  • Error Monitoring
    AirBrake provides comprehensive error monitoring for web applications, helping developers quickly identify and fix bugs. It automatically captures exceptions and provides detailed reports, improving the debugging process.
  • Integration
    AirBrake supports integration with various development tools such as GitHub, Jira, Slack, and more. This allows for seamless workflow management and collaboration between team members.
  • Real-Time Notifications
    AirBrake offers real-time notifications for errors via email, Slack, or other communication tools, ensuring that developers are immediately informed of any issues, thus minimizing downtime and improving responsiveness.
  • Detailed Reports
    AirBrake provides detailed error reports, including stack traces, environment information, and user context. This in-depth data aids in swiftly understanding the root cause of issues.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform has an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it accessible for developers of all expertise levels to navigate and utilize effectively.

Possible disadvantages of AirBrake

  • Cost
    AirBrake can be expensive, especially for small teams or startups. The cost may add up quickly as the number of applications or error occurrences increases.
  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan is quite limited in its features and capabilities, which can restrict its usability for developers who do not opt for a paid plan.
  • Customization
    Some users may find the customization options to be lacking compared to other error monitoring tools, limiting their ability to tailor alerts and reports to specific needs.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, there can be a learning curve for new users to fully utilize all the features and integrations AirBrake offers.
  • Performance Overhead
    In some cases, integrating AirBrake may introduce a slight performance overhead to the monitored applications, which could be a concern for performance-critical environments.

Google Stackdriver Error Reporting features and specs

  • Automatic Error Grouping
    Google Stackdriver Error Reporting automatically groups similar errors to provide a clear overview of individual issues. This helps in quickly identifying recurring problems and reduces noise in the error logs.
  • Real-time Error Detection
    Errors are detected and logged in real-time, allowing for immediate identification and analysis of issues. This facilitates quick response and minimizes potential downtime.
  • Integrated Alerting
    The tool integrates with Stackdriver's alerting features, enabling teams to set up alerts based on error metrics. This ensures that teams are promptly notified about critical issues.
  • User-friendly Interface
    Stackdriver Error Reporting provides a clean and intuitive interface, making it easier for teams to navigate and analyze error data, which improves productivity and reduces the learning curve.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    The service offers detailed error reports, including information like timestamps, counts, and stack traces, which aids developers in diagnosing and fixing the root cause of errors effectively.

Possible disadvantages of Google Stackdriver Error Reporting

  • Limited to Google Cloud Environment
    Stackdriver Error Reporting is primarily designed for Google Cloud Platform, potentially limiting its integration with other cloud providers or hybrid cloud environments without additional setup.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration might be complex for users unfamiliar with Google Cloud services. This might require additional time and resources to properly integrate the tool with existing systems.
  • Potential Learning Curve
    Teams not previously using Google's cloud ecosystem might face a learning curve to fully utilize the features and capabilities of Stackdriver Error Reporting.
  • Cost Considerations
    While there is a free tier, high-volume applications might incur additional costs for using Stackdriver services, which could be a concern for budget-conscious teams.
  • Integration Limitations
    Some users may find limitations in integrating with third-party tools or services outside of the Google Cloud ecosystem, which could hinder broader implementation strategies.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AirBrake and Google Stackdriver Error Reporting)
Error Tracking
100 100%
0% 0
Uptime Monitoring
0 0%
100% 100
Exception Monitoring
100 100%
0% 0
Hosted Status Pages
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using AirBrake and Google Stackdriver Error Reporting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AirBrake and Google Stackdriver Error Reporting

AirBrake Reviews

6 Bugsnag Alternatives to Consider in 2021
Airbrake can discover and report exceptions and other code issues automatically. Using Airbrake, you can quickly organize errors and events into various categories. This error grouping feature is one of the most in-demand features among error management tools and is unique to Airbrake. You can choose and design your list of categories and instruct Airbrake to classify...
Source: scoutapm.com

Google Stackdriver Error Reporting Reviews

We have no reviews of Google Stackdriver Error Reporting yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Google Stackdriver Error Reporting might be a bit more popular than AirBrake. We know about 2 links to it since March 2021 and only 2 links to AirBrake. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AirBrake mentions (2)

  • How to Setup a Project That Can Host Up to 1000 Users for Free
    The Rollbar’s ancestor, Airbrake, is another good choice (if you can afford it, because it has no free plan). You can see a detailed comparison between these two here: https://rollbar.com/vs/airbrake/. The same applies to Honeybadger — one more popular modern error management service for rails. In a nutshell, they do similar things but may have different bells and whistles. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Airbrake.io in apps
    How is the functionality of airbrake.io in apps? Looking to switch from crashlytics. Source: almost 4 years ago

Google Stackdriver Error Reporting mentions (2)

  • Newb Question: Website Performance & UX Testing
    Do you have any error reporting? Something like Sentry or Google's error reporting. Direct customer feedback can be great, but it often doesn't paint the full picture and doesn't give you technical details that help narrow down the issue. At the very least, you should be asking your customers who are providing feedback to tell you which browser and operating system they are using—a lot of the time this is enough... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Firebase Functions Cron monitoring?
    Yup use Cloud Console Error Reporting to get an email blast about all errors in the project. Https://cloud.google.com/error-reporting. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AirBrake and Google Stackdriver Error Reporting, you can also consider the following products

Sentry.io - From error tracking to performance monitoring, developers can see what actually matters, solve quicker, and learn continuously about their applications - from the frontend to the backend.

Akamai Prolexic Routed - Prolexic solutions provide fully managed DDoS protection for your applications, data centers, and network infrastructure

BugSnag - Not all bugs are worth fixing. Prioritize and fix software bugs that matter while improving software stability with every release.

Cofense - Cofense provides comprehensive phishing defense services to protect your data, reputation, and business.

Raygun - Raygun gives developers meaningful insights into problems affecting their applications. Discover issues - Understand the problem - Fix things faster.

Crisp Status Page - Monitor servers and let users know if something goes down.