Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) VS Sitecake

Compare Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) VS Sitecake and see what are their differences

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) logo Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)

Content management system, digital asset management, digital enrollment and forms, managed services.

Sitecake logo Sitecake

Drag and drop CMS for HTML websites. It's flat file CMS so it's pretty fast.
  • Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-25
  • Sitecake Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-11

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) videos

All you need to know about Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) I ZaranTech

Sitecake videos

Editing a Website with Sitecake CMS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) and Sitecake)
CMS
5 5%
95% 95
Blogging
11 11%
89% 89
Blogging Platform
10 10%
90% 90

User comments

Share your experience with using Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) and Sitecake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sitecake seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) yet. Tracking of Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Sitecake mentions (5)

  • Maintaining this site fucking sucks
    Use something like this? CMS that generates static html? https://sitecake.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Publii: Open-source local WYSIWYG static site CMS
    I think that user experience of website builders with wysiwyg and drag and drop UX won over time. Then, as time passed by, website builders become bloated and complex. Once again you needed a professional to maintain your site in site builder. So now simple solutions, static HTML, free or one-time fee CMSs are sexy again. (economy is not good, who wants another subscription?) I know because 14 years ago we have... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Best solution that would give clients the ability to edit content on their extremely minimal/simple site?
    Https://sitecake.com/ works with simple html and PHP sites.... Veeeerrrry simple for client edits. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Conventional approach to allowing business owner to edit static site?
    May be a suitable use case for https://sitecake.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Do you know any No-Code CMS or Data-Base for self-hosted Webflow Sites?
    Other than that: Inline Editing CMS examples: Coast CMS, all you need to do is make the html editable with some classes and you're done. The CMS is kind of outdated though. Other examples: simplyedit.io, surrealcms.com, jocms.net, inlinecms.com, sitecake.com. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) and Sitecake, you can also consider the following products

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.

TYPO3 - TYPO3.com - Infos, SLAs, Extended Support Versions and more

Enonic - Enonic XP is the Javascript fullstack platform that powers Enonic Apps.

ClassicPress - The WordPress fork. No Gutenberg. Great future!

Contentful - You don't need another CMS. You need a better way to manage content — unified, structured, and ready to deploy to any digital channel.

Flextype - Flat-file content management system in PHP