Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Abot for Slack VS coderpad

Compare Abot for Slack VS coderpad and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Abot for Slack logo Abot for Slack

Trusted by over 1000 Slack teams ✅. Abot is a simple and highly configurable app for anonymous feedback messages and more. If you want to create a poll on Slack or use it as an anonymous suggestion box you just need to type a simple command.

coderpad logo coderpad

Collaborative code editor with in-browser, real-time execution. Conduct programming phone screens like a boss.
  • Abot for Slack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-11-27

It is a simple Slack app allowing you to submit an honest and confidential feedback.

Whoever receives a feedback can reply to it without knowing who is the author. The author can reply back anonymously, or decide to reveal his identity.

Slack team admins can disable direct private anonymous messages or even limit Abot usage to set of whitelisted channels or permitted users group.

Create polls and allow your colleagues to vote and discuss them anonymously.

You can use to it do an anonymous AMA with your boss or just for kicks on a seperate channel.

Abot is the best way to add a customizable layer of anonymous communication on top of the Slack platform.

  • coderpad Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-07

Abot for Slack

Website
abot.app
$ Details
paid Free Trial $19.0 / Monthly
Platforms
Slack
Release Date
2018 March

coderpad

$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Abot for Slack features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Abot offers a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for teams to report and track feedback directly within Slack, enhancing user experience.
  • Real-time Feedback
    Allows team members to give and receive feedback in real-time, facilitating a quicker response time and promoting a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Integration with Slack
    Seamlessly integrates with Slack, ensuring that users do not have to leave the platform to manage feedback, which helps maintain workflow efficiency.
  • Customization Options
    Offers customization features that allow teams to tailor feedback forms and settings to better fit their specific needs and organizational culture.
  • Analytics and Reporting
    Provides detailed analytics and reporting features that help managers and team leads to track trends and identify areas for improvement over time.

Possible disadvantages of Abot for Slack

  • Limited to Slack
    Being designed specifically for Slack limits its usability to those who use this platform, making it inaccessible for teams using other communication tools.
  • Potential for Over-Notification
    With real-time notifications, there is a risk of receiving too many alerts, which can lead to notification fatigue among team members.
  • Learning Curve for Customization
    Some users may find the customization features complex, requiring a learning curve to fully utilize and optimize the tool's capabilities.
  • Dependence on Slack for Functionality
    The tool's functionality is heavily dependent on Slack's performance and reliability, which could pose issues if Slack experiences downtime.
  • Subscription Costs
    While offering valuable features, Abot comes with subscription costs that might not be feasible for very small teams or startups with limited budgets.

coderpad features and specs

  • Real-time Collaboration
    CoderPad allows multiple users to edit code simultaneously, enabling interviewers and candidates to collaborate in real-time during coding interviews.
  • Language Support
    CoderPad supports a wide array of programming languages, making it versatile for interviews across different technical roles.
  • Ease of Use
    The interface is intuitive and user-friendly, reducing the learning curve for interviewers and candidates alike.
  • Playback Feature
    The platform provides a playback feature that allows interviewers to review the coding session, which can be useful for assessing a candidate's problem-solving process.
  • Built-in Execution
    CoderPad provides the ability to run code directly within the platform, allowing candidates to test and debug their solutions during the interview.
  • Interview Customization
    The tool allows customization of interview settings and provides templates that can be reused, streamlining the preparation process for interviewers.

Possible disadvantages of coderpad

  • Limited Free Features
    CoderPad's free version has limited features, which may not be sufficient for companies that require comprehensive coding assessments.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported lag or performance issues during sessions with complex code or larger groups of participants.
  • Cost
    The subscription cost can be high for smaller companies or startups with limited budgets, making it less accessible for all organizations.
  • Internet Dependency
    As a cloud-based tool, it requires a stable internet connection, which can be problematic in regions with unreliable connectivity.
  • Feature Limitations
    While CoderPad supports multiple languages, it may not support all features of those languages, which can limit certain coding or testing requirements.

Analysis of coderpad

Overall verdict

  • CoderPad is generally regarded as a good platform, especially for organizations conducting technical interviews. Its ease of use, wide range of language support, and collaborative features are praised by many users. However, like any tool, its effectiveness can depend on specific needs and preferences.

Why this product is good

  • CoderPad is considered a valuable tool due to its real-time collaborative coding environment, which allows interviewers and candidates to write, execute, and debug code together during technical interviews. It supports multiple programming languages, provides features like a built-in compiler and sandboxed environment, and offers tools to create a seamless interview experience.

Recommended for

  • Technical recruiters and hiring managers
  • Software engineering teams conducting technical interviews
  • Candidates preparing for or participating in technical interviews

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Abot for Slack and coderpad)
Slack
100 100%
0% 0
Hiring And Recruitment
0 0%
100% 100
Chatbots
100 100%
0% 0
Programming
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Abot for Slack and coderpad. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, coderpad seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Abot for Slack mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Abot for Slack yet. Tracking of Abot for Slack recommendations started around Mar 2021.

coderpad mentions (18)

  • keep making extremely dumb mistakes?
    Some companies use things like CoderPad or Google Docs (yes, Google really used to use Google Docs). Those don't let you run the code either so they're more like whiteboards. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Coding Test for Embedded Engineering Internship - not a fan of high level coding
    I am a CS major with a computer engineering minor. I want to prepare myself to apply for an Embedded Engineering Internship. The interview process includes a coding task on coderpad.io, I have no clue what to expect - what kind of questions will be asked for an embedded internship? I say this because coding embedded systems is rather different from "regular" coding in practice. High level v low level. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Best Websites For Coders
    CoderPad : Quickly Conduct Coding Interviews and Phone Screen Interviews. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Is this a system design interview?
    I am prepping for a final round interview for a frontend position at a medium size company. The recruiter gave me some information about one of the coding rounds and I am not entirely sure what to expect. The description says I will be building a fullstack web app, and the goal is to test my frontend and backend knowledge, and get a working solution. I will be using https://excalidraw.com/ in addition to... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Live code screening practice?
    The specific target interview format I have in mind is via a shared, live editor (e.g. https://coderpad.io/) and a video link, lasting ~1hr. The practice format might be more like 45min for the interview followed by 15 - 30min for feedback and discussion. Doing two of those back to back so both of us get our chance in the hot seat could be exhausting, so this might be two separate sessions. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Abot for Slack and coderpad, you can also consider the following products

botwick - Build your own SMS-based text bot

HackerRank - HackerRank is a platform that allows companies to conduct interviews remotely to hire developers and for technical assessment purposes.

MutexBot - Keep track of your shared resources in Slack

CodeSignal - CodeSignal is the leading assessment platform for technical hiring.

Beep Boop - Ridiculously simple hosting platform for Slack bots.

HireNorm - Job Portal Builder and Coding Interview Platform