Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

4talk Messenger VS Mailosaur

Compare 4talk Messenger VS Mailosaur and see what are their differences

4talk Messenger logo 4talk Messenger

4talk is a free cloud messaging service for mobile devices and desktop computers

Mailosaur logo Mailosaur

Email Testing for QA & Development Teams.
  • 4talk Messenger Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-30
  • Mailosaur Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to 4talk Messenger and Mailosaur)
Group Chat & Notifications
Email
0 0%
100% 100
Communication
100 100%
0% 0
Email Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using 4talk Messenger and Mailosaur. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Mailosaur seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

4talk Messenger mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of 4talk Messenger yet. Tracking of 4talk Messenger recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Mailosaur mentions (4)

  • Effective Test Strategies for Testing Front-end Applications using LaunchDarkly Feature Flags and Cypress. Part2: testing
    The proper solution to tests sharing state would be randomization. Unless we are locked to real hardware - even then there is virtualization - we can randomize anything. We saw an example of this in the blog post about email testing , under the section Achieving Stateless tests with unique emails. With mailosaur any-name@unique-serverId.mailosaur.io went to that unique email server inbox, and we differentiated... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Test emails effortlessly with Cypress, Mailosaur and cy-spok
    There are plenty of email testing solutions available, and combinations of test frameworks that integrate with them. For the code snippets and working examples, we will be using Cypress and Mailosaur, but the ideas should generally apply to any tuple of email services and test automation frameworks. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Twilio blocked our account and with it hundreds of our customers
    Somewhat related anecdote. Whilst we didn't get cut off, we found a huge drop-off in time to receive, and the quality of, support from our live chat/support messaging provider. Having been a customer since our launch [1], and very early after theirs, it has been really sad and frustrating to see that friendly distrupter energy zap out of the service. I get why businesses go through that changes like this during... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Can you recommend an automation tool or library for testing received emails?
    We have enjoyed using mailosaur. Also makes it easy to see cc, bccs, etc at a glance. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing 4talk Messenger and Mailosaur, you can also consider the following products

BuddyTalk Instant Messenger - BuddyTalk is a java based instant messanger, you can login with your gmail username and password to...

Mailtrap - Email Delivery Platform that delivers just in time.
 Great for businesses and individuals.

KouChat - KouChat is a simple serverless chat client for local area networks (wifi).

MailHog - MailHog is an email testing tool inspired by MailCatcher, but easier to install.

Softros LAN messenger - LAN messenger for an internal office chat for home or business users. It does not require a server and is very easy to install and use. It supports personal chats, group chats, message brodcasting, files transfer and remote desktop access.

FakeSMTP - FakeSMTP is a Free Fake SMTP Server with GUI for testing emails in applications easily.