Https://aws.amazon.com/lightsail/?nc1=h_ls. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
AWS Lightsail 🏆 Amazon's affordable VPS hosting service, starting at $3.50/month. Explore more: AWS Lightsail. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
LightSail is decent: https://aws.amazon.com/lightsail. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Even if it's part of the gargantuan mess that's AWS with its 200 interconnected services, AWS Lightsail is actually very intuitive and fairly priced. There's a super basic $5/month VPS, even though .NET is hungry and you'll likely want the $10 one for some extra RAM. You can easily install whatever database you like on the same instance the application is running on. Source: 10 months ago
Lightsail includes everything you need to launch your project quickly – virtual machines, containers, databases, CDN, load balancers, DNS management etc. This is especially good if you just need to get started quickly and have a good jump off point seeing as Amazon Lightsail is the easiest way to get started with Amazon Web Services (AWS) if you just need virtual private servers. Lightsail includes everything you... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Have a look at Aws Lightsail. Should be the easiest to have lamp features if you must use Aws. See https://aws.amazon.com/lightsail/. Source: 11 months ago
To achieve that, we’ll be using Preevy, an open source tool for provisioning preview environments with minimal configuration. Preevy will build and deploy our app using a cloud provider, in this case cheap AWS Lightsail VMs, while exposing the services with a public, sharable URL for team collaboration. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Amazon for example tries to capture these with the Lightsail offering [1] which is a separate product from the typical AWS offering (even though of course it runs in AWS but that doesn't matter in this context). No need to go with "raw" EC2 which would make things more complicated and more expensive if all you want to have is a couple VPS. [1] https://aws.amazon.com/lightsail/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
So it's important to note that I use AWS Lightsail, not big-boy AWS. I've set up some proper AWS stuff, and it's... Not too bad, all things considered. I would recommend setting up a dev stack at some point it to learn it--you could probably emulate a full LAMP stack for under $10/month. Source: about 1 year ago
For classic website hosting and no further infrastructure, I'd recommend looking at amazon Lightsail or any other classic VPS. Using a cloud provider for this is usually more costly than a VPS if you follow recommended architecture - unless you dumb it down significantly to VPS levels (only using one availability zone, relying primarily on EC2 local storage even for logs, avoiding using Cloudwatch Logs and etc.). Source: over 1 year ago
The best option I know of currently is AWS Lightsail. You get your first 3 months free. Then beyond that it is $3.50/month for the cheapest server. Source: over 1 year ago
Essentially, Roger the developer of RogerThat created a broker that allows Hummingbot users to process webhook url messages to control the trading system remotely via charting indicators. The setup is pretty complicated but Roger is available for assistance if needed not to mention freelance developers at a minimal cost. This runs on cloud servers such as AWS Lightsail (subscription cost) but is quite affordable. Source: over 1 year ago
I've been exploring the Amazon Lightsail services recently through these previous articles:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
I ended up going with the AWS Lightsail platform for a number of reasons:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
You definitely should look at using ToastStunt and possibly switching hosts to Amazon Lightsail. Lightsail will allow you to spin up a linux box for incredibly cheap that you have full rights on, take snapshots (rollback when you complete bork things), and other modern features. Source: over 1 year ago
Lightsail was designed with your use-case in mind. In terms of AWS, it's not going to get much simpler. If Lightsail isn't simple enough, then AWS isn't for you. Source: over 1 year ago
Amazon Lightsail – the introducer and purveyor of virtual private servers. Source: almost 2 years ago
For your situation, you are right that you'd probably need a VPS. I'll always choose AWS for my hosting needs so in this case AWS Lightsail will probably be the most economical for you. $3.50/month flat rate for a linux server and $8/month for Windows. (This is why no one runs Windows servers if you can help it.). Source: almost 2 years ago
Alternatively if you do not expect to get much traffic to the application, Amazon Lightsail is a dirt cheap way to run containers too, just don’t expect too much integration with other AWS Services. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Ellis Parry-Nweye and Justin Wheeler have analyzed the AWS product Lightsail and provided their analysis here. The analysis was done by attempting to host a simple Java Spring Boot application on Lightsail Instances. These instances were fronted by a Lightsail Load Balancer. We leveraged Lightsail Object Storage to stage the jar file that we would deploy. The described architecture could be created using... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
However, if you’re in need of using a CMS like Wordpress, I suggest you look at companies that provide hosting solutions or use a dedicated service like AWS Lightsail. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Amazon Lightsail to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about Amazon Lightsail. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.