I know there's Snowpack (though it is no longer maintained), which takes a different, a bit more complex approach. The CJS runtime approach seems way simpler, almost too good to be true? Is there something I'm missing? Source: almost 2 years ago

This is somewhat reminiscent of the Astro devs’ decision late last year to transition Astro from their own Snowpack platform to Vite. It wasn’t easy, but the performance win was significant. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

I have a silly react project that I’m working on that I made using create-react-app. By default, these kinds of projects build and run using react-scripts which uses webpack under the hood for building projects. Vite is generally known to be faster than Webpack ⚡ so I was curious about how to swap them. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago

We wanted to change the bundler to vite for two main reasons:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

You can see all create-vite templates for other libraries. You can also learn more about vite in its documentation website. - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago

After we have installed the Node environment, we can use Vite to install. Because the use of Vite has a higher version of Node.js requirements, so I recommend that you install a relatively new Node.js. Currently I use the version for v18.15.0. - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago

Import { defineConfig } from 'vite' Import riot from 'rollup-plugin-riot' Export default defineConfig({ root : process.cwd() + '/client', plugins : [riot()], build: { minify : 'esbuild', /** https://vitejs.dev/config/build-options.html#build-minify */ target : 'esnext' /** https://vitejs.dev/config/build-options.html#build-target */ } }). - Source: dev.to / 20 days ago