Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cirrus CSS VS Bulma

Compare Cirrus CSS VS Bulma and see what are their differences

Cirrus CSS logo Cirrus CSS

The SCSS framework for the modern web. It's component based, customizable, and completely open source.

Bulma logo Bulma

Bulma is an open source CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass. It's 100% responsive, fully modular, and available for free.
  • Cirrus CSS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-03

Cirrus is a modular, responsive, and component centric SCSS framework aimed at bringing beautiful, hassle-free styling. Cirrus works right away with minimal styling. From there, add components and tweak using utility classes to make it truly your own.

  • Bulma Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-14

Cirrus CSS videos

No Cirrus CSS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Bulma videos

S.H. Figuarts BULMA Dragon Ball Action Figure Review

More videos:

  • Review - S.H. Figuarts Dragon Ball Adventure Begins Bulma Review
  • Review - Bandai SH Figuarts BULMA Review BR / DiegoHDM

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cirrus CSS and Bulma)
CSS Framework
11 11%
89% 89
Design Tools
10 10%
90% 90
Developer Tools
4 4%
96% 96
Frontend Development
100 100%
0% 0

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Cirrus CSS and Bulma.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Cirrus CSS's answer

Cirrus is possible thanks to open source contributors on Dart Sass and True (Sass unit testing framework).

What makes your product unique?

Cirrus CSS's answer

There are often debates on whether component-centric frameworks such as Bootstrap or atomic-classed frameworks such as Tailwind are better for its: - Learning curve - Maintainability - Flexibility - Ease of use

I am a fan of both frameworks as they have their strengths depending on the situation. With component-based frameworks, it is quite easy to slap a couple of different elements together and you have a working website. However, customization may require writing lots of other CSS yourself which takes time away from building your product. Utility-class-based frameworks offer customization that is as granular as it gets short of writing the CSS yourself but without the overhead. A major drawback is that being able to customize and use tree shaking requires direct integration of Tailwind into your project and a CDN version is not feasible for production.

Cirrus is a framework that takes the best parts of both of these types of frameworks and provides: - Many pre-built basic components to accelerate your development velocity (e.g. Avatars, Modals, Tabs, etc.). To keep your code clean, all component classes are built following the BEM convention. - A suite of common utility classes to help tweak and polish your designs when needed. These utility classes are so powerful that you can construct components with them alone. - Different CDN builds of the framework that can be dropped in at any browser (core, ext, all). Choose one that fits your needs.

With the release of 0.7, much of the framework can now be customized. Since the framework is written entirely in SCSS, it can take advantage of all the existing APIs for class generation. The new configuration system in Cirrus allows you to: - Add/Edit/Delete component styles. - Add/Edit/Delete utility classes. - Specify which breakpoints are supported. - Toggle which classes should have viewport variants (to help save on build size). - Enable/Disable different parts of the framework. - And more :)

What's the story behind your product?

Cirrus CSS's answer

Started in late 2016, Cirrus was built as a side project of mine to foray into web development. Since then it has grown immensely with the addition of components, more utility classes, CSS grid, etc. My main goal for this framework is to make web development as painless as possible -- and that always starts with great documentation and consistency in design choices.

User comments

Share your experience with using Cirrus CSS and Bulma. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cirrus CSS and Bulma

Cirrus CSS Reviews

15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Regarding its extensive suite of components, Cirrus not only provides base styles for page layouts but also a variety of different components. It works immediately with minimal styling. From there, you can add components and customize using utility classes to truly make it your own.
Source: coursesity.com

Bulma Reviews

22 Best Bootstrap Alternatives & What Each Is Best For
I chose Bulma for its efficient use of Flexbox, a layout model that allows a responsive design with minimal effort. This efficiency sets Bulma apart from many other CSS frameworks. In my judgment, Bulma stands out as the best choice for developers seeking a powerful, Flexbox-based CSS framework for creating flexible and intuitive web designs.
Source: thectoclub.com
15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Suppose you want to learn the valuable skill of working with the mobile-first Bulma framework. In that case, we highly recommend taking the "Master Bulma CSS Framework" course by Jeppe Schaumburg Jensen on Udemy. In this course, you will master the latest version of Bulma and create real projects and themes while learning HTML, web design, and coding.
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
Bulma comes with a beautiful range of colors out-of-the-box, and it won’t be wrong if we call it the most beautiful framework out there in the market. It can be used directly to get really nice-looking websites with the very least effort.
Source: hackr.io
11 Best Material UI Alternatives
Bulma’s simplicity, extensive documentation, and community support make it a popular choice for projects of all sizes. Whether you’re building a landing page, a dashboard, or an eCommerce site, Bulma provides a solid foundation for building aesthetically pleasing and functional interfaces.
Source: www.uxpin.com
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
Although new, Bulma has quickly climbed up the list of top 10 CSS frameworks. It has no JavaScript components (no .js) and the most readable CSS classes. To create grids, Bulma has a powerful system known as tiles, making the page elegant and neat. It is highly modular and easy to learn. Although small, Bulma has a community of passionate individuals wanting to change the...
Source: hackr.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Bulma seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 109 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cirrus CSS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Cirrus CSS yet. Tracking of Cirrus CSS recommendations started around Aug 2021.

Bulma mentions (109)

  • How to use Tailwind with any CSS framework
    Tailwind is great, but creating everything from scratch is annoying. A nice base of components which can be extended with tailwind would be great. There are a few tailwind frameworks like Flowbite, Daisy Ui, but I like Bulma, PicoCSS and Bootstrap. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Building Llama as a Service (LaaS)
    I would talk about building the frontend, but it is just a single page React app I built quickly. It does use a CSS library called Bulma, which is similar to tailwind and worth checking out. I did spend a day implementing a login/signup page, but this was just for the learning experience, and not what I wanted in the final product. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Replatforming from Gatsby to Zola!
    After finding a few spare hours I decided to address the alerts and update some my dependencies. I spent several hours debugging my Gatsby site after doing some recommended npm package updates. My UI class library Bulma was not being loaded by my sass-loader module. (I later learned that they migrated to dart-sass so I guess the fix should have been a pretty easy). Nonetheless, this prompted me to rethink my... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • The Bulma CSS framework reaches 1.0
    Oh wow, quite happy about this, for a while it seemed the project was abandoned, really glad Jeremy keeps working on this :) The new website (https://bulma.io/) also looks very slick. I could totally see that he'd be able to monetize this like Tailwind, it's a really well thought-out framework with a good compromise between responsiveness, utility classes and components. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Building a flat-file CMS with Angular
    So, our post.component.html component is the generic page where all posts will have their content loaded. Here, the classes are from the Bulma CSS framework, and the template looks like this:. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cirrus CSS and Bulma, you can also consider the following products

Semantic UI - A UI Component library implemented using a set of specifications designed around natural language

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Foundation - The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world

Material UI - A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design