2) https://jsbench.me/ allows you to quickly benchmark alternative implementations of something. Source: over 1 year ago
I did my testing on https://jsbench.me, put the function in the setup section and the actual call in test cases. I added another function, this time using an Int32Array instead and random values between -1_000 and +1_000. Just to be thorough and because I found it interesting, I also added a Float32Array version this time using the result from Math.random() without any scaling. This leads to an interesting... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
To actually measure performance, you can use benchmarking tools. For JavaScript try out https://jsbench.me to compare the performance of different approaches to the same problem. Source: over 1 year ago
I ran it on jsbench.me and the unoptimized one is 5% faster. I also saw the same thing in my console while testing. It wasn't the result I was looking for but here we are. Source: over 1 year ago
You can bench them with something like JSBench.me and compare browser compatibility with Can I use.... Source: almost 2 years ago
Yes and no. Under the hood, Desmos evaluates expressions using Javascript, and there is definitely a performance cost in doing Math.pow(3,2) compared to 3*3. (I tested at https://jsbench.me/ and saw about a 10% difference in operations per second.). Source: almost 2 years ago
Https://jsbench.me/ - can help with performance measuring. Source: about 2 years ago
Core idea is like https://jsbench.me/, but also it will have some features from https://codesandbox.io/ - code editor, maybe preview, easy to install npm packages. Source: about 2 years ago
In order to be sure that we introduce a quicker solution we should employ a tool like jsbench.me. First we add tested data at "Setup JS" stage. Then add test cases with different function implementations. Check this bench with suggested implementation and run it yourself for results. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Maybe even a comparison on https://jsbench.me/ ? Source: over 2 years ago
You can try it yourself using a site like jsbench (or any of the options in this StackOverflow thread). Find some example of reduce in your codebase, extract it so a simple script, and then write the equivalent with for loops or recursion or whatever you want to test. Compare them at this site and see what happens. Source: over 2 years ago
I was using jsbench.me to try to track performance, but I don't think the site handles these types of performance tests well. Source: almost 3 years ago
Benchmarking these programs against each other shows the second solution runs roughly 50% faster. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Do you know an article comparing JSBench.me to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about JSBench.me. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.