Software Alternatives & Reviews

Jekyll Reviews

Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

Social recommendations and mentions

We have tracked the following product recommendations or mentions on Reddit and HackerNews. They can help you see what people think about Jekyll and what they use it for.
  • Deploying GitHub Pages sites with GitHub Workflows
    Well, I say things were still working in the old way... They were, but something was a bit different. It seemed that the old method was being powered by a new GitHub Workflow called "pages-build-deployment" that had been automatically added to all the repos that needed it. And looking into the details of that workflow, I noticed that it was doing some things that were unnecessary in my repos - for example it... - Source: / 6 days ago
  • Create a free static website using Github Pages and Jekyll
    Jekyll (static site generator tool) is integrated with GitHub pages providing professional looking themes and many free templates for your website. - Source: / 23 days ago
  • I am trying to create a STATIC blog for a long time but I am stuck with where to store all these files.
    If you don't feel like you need to create it from scratch (as in: if you want to have a static blog or website, and you don't mind if you didn't code every little aspect of it), I'd recommend using a generator like Jekyll, Gatsby or Hugo. And even if you don't directly use them, you can learn a bit on how they do this sort of implementation. - Source: Reddit / 28 days ago
  • Consider the Jamstack for Your Next Solo Project
    Previously I have used Jekyll for blogging and it has served me well for simple blogs and static websites. Jekyll is a static site generator that relies on Markdown, Liquid, HTML, and CSS. Which means no JavaScript -- a Jamstack without the J. With GitHub Pages you can even host Jekyll sites directly from your repository.2. - Source: / about 2 months ago
  • Creating sites, the Jamstack way
    The first step to building a Jamstack website is choosing a static site generator (SSG). There are many different options available, each with its pros and cons. The most popular include Jekyll, Hugo, Gatsby, Next.js, and Nuxt.js. Following an introduction tutorial and building a small project is the best way to get your feet wet. CloudCannon offers learning path tutorials for Jekyll and Hugo for those getting... - Source: / about 2 months ago
  • Lightweight SSR Ruby framework for resume page
    I've heard good things about - it's a static site generator. - Source: Reddit / about 2 months ago
  • Deploy a static site to AWS S3 and CloudFront using AWS CDK
    For the purposes of this tutorial, we will not be focusing on fine-tuning the site contents. Today, I will be deploying a simple static blog and have chosen to use Hugo as my framework (other popular alternatives for this purpose include 11ty, Astro, and Jekyll). I don't need any complex user interactions, so a static site generator is sufficient for my needs. If you plan to use Hugo as well, make sure it is... - Source: / 3 months ago
  • Jekyll and the gh-pages
    Jekyll • Simple, blog-aware, static sites | Transform your plain text into static websites and blogs. - Source: / 2 months ago
  • Blogging at Hashnode
    I've been getting increasingly frustrated using Jekyll to build my personal blog. It's great for what it is, but I don't know or really understand Ruby (nor do I want to at this point), and running updates, installing add-ons or even running it locally always seemed to be problematic. I loved how customisable everything was, but making changes or publishing articles wasn't quick or particularly easy (for me anyway). - Source: / 2 months ago
  • How to verify a successful website migration to 11ty - test every sitemap link
    I migrated my website from Jekyll to eleventy (11ty) recently. I wanted to preserve the same URLs for the vast majority of my webpages. - Source: / 3 months ago
  • CI strategy for website in GitHub repo
    Check out and if you haven't seen it yet. GitHub action could compile your website to static HTML+CSS (and even some JS). You could host it wherever you want after that, incl. On GitHub page or from a container running on K8S. For the latter I'd recommend splitting CI from CD and use ArgoCD or similar. However as previously stated by others hosting static content on K8S is... - Source: Reddit / 3 months ago
  • Migrating from plain text to some kind of CMS
    Hugo would be my vote too. Alterinatives to Hugo are Jekyll and Gatsby. - Source: Reddit / 3 months ago
  • WTF is Jamstack: The Best Way to Build Content Sites?
    Static websites started to gain popularity in 2015 because of Jekyll and other related technology. In the same year, Mathias Biilmann and Chris Bach from Netlify came up with the term “Jamstack”. - Source: / 4 months ago
  • What's up? What tool do you use for your Digital Garden?
    For something, I wound up using the static site generator, jekyll w/ a modified version of a theme called gradfolio which is hosted on github pages. my site, or, rather, my something's source code is available here in it's github repository. - Source: Reddit / 4 months ago
  • Any have a comprehensive table of web hosts and their costs for various plans, both for the first year and beyond?
    Something else you might consider if you aren't tied to WordPress, there's other blogging platforms which can be run locally and just spit out HTML/CSS/JavaScript which you can then upload to a static web host. This would make it basically free to host since you wouldn't need a traditional server. But would require you to change how you do things. If you want more control over the website's look, GrapeJS is a full... - Source: Reddit / 4 months ago
  • Ask HN: Good resource on writing web app with plain JavaScript/HTML/CSS
    Some of these responses… wow. Using modern HTML and CSS will get you pretty far these days. For example, dealing with forms used to be problematic in a few different ways without JavaScript or something server-side. Now form validation can be done with CSS [1]. For example, static site hosts like Netlify have services for dealing with the form data [2]. 100 free form submissions per month. I agree that tooling is... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Best file format for uploading blogs
    It sounds like you're describing Jekyll, to an extent. - Source: Reddit / 4 months ago
  • Low code solutions for devs to consider.
    These are nifty tools that let you create a fully static build of a website (no server-side code required). Tools like gatsby, eleventy and jekyll allow you to author a website's content with plain text files. Then, you can generate a full web experience from the files. - Source: / 4 months ago
  • Building a static blog using Jekyll & Strapi
    To make their creation easier, numerous open-source static websites generators are available: Jekyll, Hugo, Gatsby, Hexo, etc. Most of the time, the content is managed through static (ideally Markdown) files or a Content API. Then, the generator requests the content, injects it in templates defined by the developer and generates a bunch of HTML files. - Source: / 4 months ago
  • Framework for making static sites with reactjs for shared hosting sites.
    Otherwise, Jekyll might be worth a look as well, or 11ty. These don't use React, but might serve your needs. - Source: Reddit / 4 months ago
  • New Jekyll Plugin for Link Attributes
    Our website uses Jekyll, a static site framework. I chose Jekyll to help us manage a large amount of content. Managing all of our site content in a code repository means we can manipulate all sorts of things with a little bit of code. - Source: / 5 months ago

External sources with reviews and comparisons of Jekyll

11 Popular Free And Open Source WordPress CMS alternatives in 2021
Unlike some listed alternatives, Jekyll is also a static site generator so it lays in the same category. It uses Ruby and we would say it's simpler, free, and open-source CMS software.
10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Jekyll isn’t strict with its content location. It expects pages in the root of your site, and will build whatever’s there. Here’s how you might organize these pages in your Jekyll site root:
9 Reasons I Think Craft is the Best CMS on the Market Today
Craft CMS is simple, minimalistic, agile and has every capability a modern CMS framework needs. Over the past ten years we have worked with every CMS you could think of (Wordpress, Drupal, Rails+ActiveAdmin, Ghost, Weebly, DjangoCMS, Jekyll, Joomla, Tumblr, Squarespace, Expression Engine, Statamic, Blogger)… here are the reasons why we’ve landed firmly with Craft as our №1 choice.
Top Static Site Generators For 2019
Jekyll is a a static site generator which is available since 2009 and is build based on top of Ruby. Jekyll is also the engine behind GitHub Pages. GitHub Pages are public web pages for users, organizations, and repositories, that are freely hosted on GitHub’s domain or on a custom domain name of your choice. The fact that Jekyll is powering GitHub Pages is also the reason why Jekyll is the most popular...
Hugo or Jekyll? 6 Factors You Should Know
Jekyll comes with a development server built-in, which you can run by calling bundle exec Jekyll serve.
16 Best: Blog Software Comparison (Free / Open-Source Tools)
Jekyll is a different flavor of blog software that is also suitable for more technically inclined bloggers. Unlike sites such as WordPress or Ghost, which run on a company server, Jekyll is a static site generator. This means you generate the blog via Jekyll using static files on your computer, including a configuration file, templates, and Markdown or HTML for individual posts.
Goodbye Statamic. Hello Grav.
At first I was really excited by a app called Docpad, which worked in a similar way to Jekyll, i.e. processing pages and outputting purely flat html/css/js files.
Migrating to Statamic
Although I am a big fan of Jekyll, on this occasion I decided to go with Statamic. This was mainly driven by ease of publishing using Statamic control panel. Statamic control panel provides ability to manage content anytime anywhere on any device. Now all I need is a browser with internet connection. With Jekyll I was limited by publishing workflow which requires more than a browser.

Do you know an article comparing Jekyll to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.