Well, I say things were still working in the old way... They were, but something was a bit different. It seemed that the old method was being powered by a new GitHub Workflow called "pages-build-deployment" that had been automatically added to all the repos that needed it. And looking into the details of that workflow, I noticed that it was doing some things that were unnecessary in my repos - for example it... - Source: dev.to / 6 days ago
Jekyll (static site generator tool) is integrated with GitHub pages providing professional looking themes and many free templates for your website. - Source: dev.to / 23 days ago
If you don't feel like you need to create it from scratch (as in: if you want to have a static blog or website, and you don't mind if you didn't code every little aspect of it), I'd recommend using a generator like Jekyll, Gatsby or Hugo. And even if you don't directly use them, you can learn a bit on how they do this sort of implementation. - Source: Reddit / 28 days ago
Previously I have used Jekyll for blogging and it has served me well for simple blogs and static websites. Jekyll is a static site generator that relies on Markdown, Liquid, HTML, and CSS. Which means no JavaScript -- a Jamstack without the J. With GitHub Pages you can even host Jekyll sites directly from your repository.2. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
The first step to building a Jamstack website is choosing a static site generator (SSG). There are many different options available, each with its pros and cons. The most popular include Jekyll, Hugo, Gatsby, Next.js, and Nuxt.js. Following an introduction tutorial and building a small project is the best way to get your feet wet. CloudCannon offers learning path tutorials for Jekyll and Hugo for those getting... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
I've heard good things about https://jekyllrb.com/ - it's a static site generator. - Source: Reddit / about 2 months ago
For the purposes of this tutorial, we will not be focusing on fine-tuning the site contents. Today, I will be deploying a simple static blog and have chosen to use Hugo as my framework (other popular alternatives for this purpose include 11ty, Astro, and Jekyll). I don't need any complex user interactions, so a static site generator is sufficient for my needs. If you plan to use Hugo as well, make sure it is... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Jekyll • Simple, blog-aware, static sites | Transform your plain text into static websites and blogs. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
I've been getting increasingly frustrated using Jekyll to build my personal blog. It's great for what it is, but I don't know or really understand Ruby (nor do I want to at this point), and running updates, installing add-ons or even running it locally always seemed to be problematic. I loved how customisable everything was, but making changes or publishing articles wasn't quick or particularly easy (for me anyway). - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
I migrated my website from Jekyll to eleventy (11ty) recently. I wanted to preserve the same URLs for the vast majority of my webpages. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Check out https://jekyllrb.com/ and https://gohugo.io/ if you haven't seen it yet. GitHub action could compile your website to static HTML+CSS (and even some JS). You could host it wherever you want after that, incl. On GitHub page or from a container running on K8S. For the latter I'd recommend splitting CI from CD and use ArgoCD or similar. However as previously stated by others hosting static content on K8S is... - Source: Reddit / 3 months ago
Hugo would be my vote too. Alterinatives to Hugo are Jekyll and Gatsby. - Source: Reddit / 3 months ago
Static websites started to gain popularity in 2015 because of Jekyll and other related technology. In the same year, Mathias Biilmann and Chris Bach from Netlify came up with the term “Jamstack”. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
For something, I wound up using the static site generator, jekyll w/ a modified version of a theme called gradfolio which is hosted on github pages. my site, or, rather, my something's source code is available here in it's github repository. - Source: Reddit / 4 months ago
Something else you might consider if you aren't tied to WordPress, there's other blogging platforms which can be run locally and just spit out HTML/CSS/JavaScript which you can then upload to a static web host. This would make it basically free to host since you wouldn't need a traditional server. But would require you to change how you do things. If you want more control over the website's look, GrapeJS is a full... - Source: Reddit / 4 months ago
Some of these responses… wow. Using modern HTML and CSS will get you pretty far these days. For example, dealing with forms used to be problematic in a few different ways without JavaScript or something server-side. Now form validation can be done with CSS [1]. For example, static site hosts like Netlify have services for dealing with the form data [2]. 100 free form submissions per month. I agree that tooling is... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
It sounds like you're describing Jekyll, to an extent. - Source: Reddit / 4 months ago
These are nifty tools that let you create a fully static build of a website (no server-side code required). Tools like gatsby, eleventy and jekyll allow you to author a website's content with plain text files. Then, you can generate a full web experience from the files. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
To make their creation easier, numerous open-source static websites generators are available: Jekyll, Hugo, Gatsby, Hexo, etc. Most of the time, the content is managed through static (ideally Markdown) files or a Content API. Then, the generator requests the content, injects it in templates defined by the developer and generates a bunch of HTML files. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Otherwise, Jekyll might be worth a look as well, or 11ty. These don't use React, but might serve your needs. - Source: Reddit / 4 months ago
Our website uses Jekyll, a static site framework. I chose Jekyll to help us manage a large amount of content. Managing all of our site content in a code repository means we can manipulate all sorts of things with a little bit of code. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Do you know an article comparing Jekyll to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.