A lot of competitors to indiebrands have many logos that just aren't suitable for use as App icons or as favicons. Look at Brandbuckets logs with those complex shapes, they might look interesting, but don't work. On Indiebrands the logos are clean and suitable for modern use
Not sure about profitable, but it’s still definitely a Thing. Look at .eth domains for the most egregious case today. I just saw https://indiebrands.io the other day. Basically a domain squatting operation but the guy operating it is convinced it is him that is creating the value rather than… you know… someone actually using the domain for something other than selling it. So, yes it’s still out there and... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Make sure to subscribe to our newsletter - we'll include a 20% coupon for the first 48 hours! - Source: Reddit / 6 months ago
The post you've read is all part of a new article I've released on Indiebrands.io If you want to read the whole article you can read it here. - Source: Reddit / 7 months ago
Thank you! For context: indiebrands.io is a brand-market we build, where founders can buy domains & logos for their business. That's why it's kept so vague so that it's possible for different business to make use of the brand. - Source: Reddit / 7 months ago
Thank you very much. I have to say the icon is my favourite part of the design. We sell those domains over on indiebrands.io in case you want to have it for your company. - Source: Reddit / 8 months ago
So, what's the moral of the story? People like reading about money. Ps:Also attach stripe revenue charts to your tweets, people like those. The product? https://indiebrands.io. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Do you know an article comparing IndieBrands.io to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.