Software Alternatives & Reviews

Wintersmith VS Nanoc

Compare Wintersmith VS Nanoc and see what are their differences

Wintersmith logo Wintersmith

Flexible, minimalistic, multi-platform static site generator built on top of node.js

Nanoc logo Nanoc

A static-site generator written in Ruby
  • Wintersmith Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30
  • Nanoc Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-08-11

Wintersmith videos

Wintersmiths Ice Spheres New Ice Chest: Unboxing and Demo

More videos:

  • Review - Unboxing & Review of Wintersmiths Ice Chest Clear Cube Maker | Cocktail | Artisanal
  • Review - SenshiReviews Wintersmith and the Lunar Chronicles

Nanoc videos

No Nanoc videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Wintersmith and Nanoc)
CMS
63 63%
37% 37
Blogging
64 64%
36% 36
Blogging Platform
67 67%
33% 33
Static Site Generators
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Wintersmith and Nanoc. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Nanoc seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Wintersmith mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Wintersmith yet. Tracking of Wintersmith recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Nanoc mentions (4)

  • The Open Source Story - Open Sourcing RudderStack Blog and Docs
    When we decided to open-source our blog and docs, we were spoilt for choices. Today there are multiple well-supported and fully-featured frameworks for open-source content creation. Some of the options that we considered were Ghost, Jekyll, Hugo, Nanoc, and Gatsby. There are even more frameworks beyond these, and each tool has its pros and cons. Which one do we recommend? Well, we don’t. The best tool for you is... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • What do you use for public publishing your Zettlekasten?
    My websites use a static site generator, that means I have folders of Markdown files and they get converted by this program to HTML. (I'm using nanoc for nearly a decade, but other generators work fine. I like Ruby, so that's why I never tried any of the new JS stuff.) I don't just hit publish on my whole Zettelkasten, but that would work as well if you point your static site generator to your note archive. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Creating a minimalist blog with Jekyll Now
    Last time I was evaluating static site generators, Dimples and Nanoc both stood out for this recent-updates reason, among other personal criteria. https://github.com/waferbaby/dimples https://nanoc.ws/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Something like Github pages but for a wiki?
    I've been looking for something like that for months and now I am pretty confident that such thing does not exist. You can try to bend existing SSG solution to be more wiki-like, but that's all. In that department, I have most success with Zola. But since you asked it in Ruby sub, have a look at Bridgetown or nanoc. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Wintersmith and Nanoc, you can also consider the following products

Metalsmith - An extremely simple, pluggable static site generator.

GatsbyJS - Blazing-fast static site generator for React

Nikola - Nikola is s static site generator tool written in Python.

Hexo - A fast, simple & powerful blog framework, powered by Node.js

Assemble - The static site generator for Node.js, Grunt.js and Yeoman

Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.