Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

WinMTR VS iperf

Compare WinMTR VS iperf and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

WinMTR logo WinMTR

Free Network Diagnostic Tool. WinMTR is an equivalent of mtr for Windows.

iperf logo iperf

A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool
  • WinMTR Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-12
  • iperf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17

WinMTR videos

+ Add

WinMTR tutorial

iperf videos

+ Add

Using Iperf to measure network speed / bandwidth

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to use iperf to test local network LAN speed in Windows 10
  • Review - [HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WinMTR and iperf)

WinMTR

iperf

Monitoring Tools
15 15%
Monitoring Tools
85% 85
Log Management
17 17%
Log Management
83% 83
OS & Utilities
100 100%
OS & Utilities
0% 0
Network & Admin
0 0%
Network & Admin
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using WinMTR and iperf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, iperf should be more popular than WinMTR. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WinMTR mentions (1)

  • IPV4 connectivity impacted IPv6 remains solid
    Run an MTR if you can (winmtr.net will work on Windows, MTR is a native package on Linux that you can easily install). MTR will collect traceroute data over time and help you see where the connection is breaking down. Source: about 1 year ago

iperf mentions (4)

  • Microsoft: Don't Use Iperf3 on Windows
    Just some clarification: IPerf 2 is different from the iperf3 found at https://github.com/esnet/iperf. - Source: Hacker News / 4 days ago
  • Yet Another Bench Script (YABS): evaluate Linux server performance with this simple Bash script and utility
    Network - network throughput (both incoming and outgoing) is tested using iperf3 on several geographically diverse public iperf servers. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Speed testing Visible with a modem
    File transfer using iperf3 over Tailscale. I noticed that the bandwidth to my home computer (on a 500/500 fiber connection) was higher than with speedtest.net. For the first few days I was getting downloads and uploads of 28Mbps (+/- std dev of 6Mbps) and 150ms latency (+/- 35ms). After somewhere around 100GB total transfer (maybe half of that over Tailscale), it is now downloading and uploading at 10Mbps (+/-... Source: about 2 years ago
  • FTP upload speed isn't great
    I can add to this. I have two mini self contained projects to create multiarch static bins of mtr and iperf3 for general usage. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WinMTR and iperf, you can also consider the following products

PingPlotter - PingPlotter is a troubleshooting tool that helps IT professionals and neophytes identify, diagnose, and resolve network issues.

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

mtr - mtr combines the functionality of the 'traceroute' and 'ping' programs in a single...

SmokePing - Smokeping is a tool for measuring latency.

Wireshark - Wireshark is a network protocol analyzer for Unix and Windows. It lets you capture and interactively browse the traffic running on a computer network.

GPING - GPING (Graphical Ping) is a powerful utility that pings and graphs multiple hosts simultaneously...

Loading...