Windows RestClient VS Hurl.dev

Windows RestClient mentions (0)

Hurl.dev mentions (24)

• Twenty-Five Years of Curl

  You could also try Hurl [1] which is a cli tool using plain text and libcurl for run and test HTTP requests. I'm one of the maintainer and very grateful to curl/libcurl! My project couldn't exist without it. [1] https://hurl.dev. - Source: Hacker News / 5 days ago

• Postman is limiting local collection runner to 25 runs for basic plans

  Shameless plug: why not switch to Hurl [1], an open source cli tool to run and test HTTP requests in plain text, with libcurl under the hood? (I'm one of the maintainer) [1]: https://hurl.dev. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• The building blocks of great docs

  On my iPhone, when I click on home links (let's say Webhooks & notifications), I'm redirected to the middle of the target page. I'm sure it's a small bug, but it's kind of sad that basic navigation is half broken. On my pet documentation site [1], I've chosen the boring way: - fully static HTML (Jekyll) - minimal JavaScript (especially no tracking) - search is local I find mysite quite reactive without complicated... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

• KATT (Klarna API Testing Tool) Is an HTTP-Based API Testing Tool for Erlang

  I've recently used Hurl [1] in some projects. It seems to have a similar goal and I like I a lot. [1]: https://hurl.dev. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• Hurl, run and test HTTP requests with plain text

  A better url might be https://hurl.dev/ Hurl runs super fast without startup latency unlike a lot of tools in this category written in node. The plain text format can be checked in and this can be part of your CI process. Hurl can capture data from previous requests to run workflows and serve as a testing tool. The main downside is the lack of a GUI, although I imagine it being not that hard to do something like... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago