Wiktionary VS dict.cc

When you use the dictionary in English, as I tell to anyone learning English, the best dictionary is not a traditional dictionary, but is wiktionary.org, which itself includes the same definitions as the ones you've linked, but additionally contains "usage notes" that point out how rare and niche the archaic use of "America" to refer to a geographical continent is. It only comes up when you are talking about... Source: 11 months ago

For single words just use a dictionary. wiktionary.org works most of the time and usually is very informative. Source: 11 months ago

Wiktionary.org is very good if you can read Finnish well enough. I don't expect English wiktionary to have a lot of content. Source: 11 months ago

Two good resources to check for accurate pronunciation are wiktionary.org and forvo.com for a variety of voice recordings for words. Source: 12 months ago

For words, it helps a lot to look them up on wiktionary.org or dictionary.com and read the IPA. For example, "complicated" is a word which stresses the 1st syllable, but you've put the stress on the 3rd. Generally, the stress stays on the same part of the word as the root word (COM-pli-cate), and adding -ed or -ing doesn't change it. e.g. MO-ti-vate, MO-tivating, MO-tivated. Source: 12 months ago

Anyway, dict.cc says sich anhören is nur unpersönlich. So, I guess I can't use it to describe people? Like, Sie hört sich seltsam an would be incorrect? Source: 6 months ago

So, I looked up excitement on dict.cc. It gave me...die Aufregung, die Begeisterung, die Spannung, die Erregung...which of these words would you all use for the general concept of "excitement?". Source: 6 months ago

In Scandinavian (Swedish for example), verb loanwords end in '-era', while in the very similar German language, verb loanwords end in '-ieren' (eg, das Auto zu parkieren). But you see, until a spelling reform in approx. 1907, the spelling was '-iren'. LEO doesn't have 'assentieren', but dict.cc does. However, these two Websites I named are really wordlists, not dictionaries. Source: 10 months ago

You can use the vocab trainer on dict.cc. Source: 12 months ago

I thought this word would also exist in English, maybe with a little difference at best. My translator (dict.cc) recommends autarkic, autarkical (both with 'k', surprisingly) and autarchic. But my online spellchecker here underlines all of them with a red line. Source: 12 months ago