Software Alternatives & Reviews

Weava VS Thomson Reuters

Compare Weava VS Thomson Reuters and see what are their differences

Weava logo Weava

Workspace to highlight, organize & collaborate on your research articles.

Thomson Reuters logo Thomson Reuters

The intelligence, technology and human expertise you need to find trusted answers. Thomson Reuters is The Answer Company.
  • Weava Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-27
  • Thomson Reuters Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19

Weava

Categories
  • Bookmark Manager
  • Bookmarks
  • Research Tools
  • Note Taking
Website weavatools.com
Pricing URL Official Weava Pricing

Thomson Reuters

Categories
  • Research Tools
  • Information Organization
  • Document Management
  • Reference Management
Website thomsonreuters.com
Pricing URL-

Weava videos

How to use Weava for research

More videos:

  • Review - Chrome Extensions Note Anywhere, Super Simple Highlighter, Weava

Thomson Reuters videos

Thomson Reuters Employee Reviews - Q3 2018

More videos:

  • Review - Thomson Reuters eDiscovery Point Video Review
  • Review - Thomson Reuters StockReports+: The report explained by Bala Ilango

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Weava and Thomson Reuters)
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Research Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Bookmark Manager
100 100%
0% 0
Information Organization
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Weava and Thomson Reuters. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Weava and Thomson Reuters

Weava Reviews

We have no reviews of Weava yet.
Be the first one to post

Thomson Reuters Reviews

Citation Management Tools - Alternatives to EndNote
Many are familiar with EndNote as a helpful citation management tool that assists with collecting, saving, and citing papers. But sometimes EndNote can feel somewhat cumbersome to use. If you are on the market for a new citation manager, you might want to try out these other options.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Weava seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Weava mentions (2)

  • Looking for a website listing theories with sources
    It might help to use a highlighting app, something like Weava (weavatools.com) which will store and collect your highlights off to the side of the text so you don't have to keep flipping through pages. Source: about 1 year ago
  • does anyone know how to study (like actually)
    For classes with a lot of readings, use an annotation thing like Weava (weavatools.com) or Zotero that keeps all your highlights in one place and searchable. Source: over 1 year ago

Thomson Reuters mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Thomson Reuters yet. Tracking of Thomson Reuters recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Weava and Thomson Reuters, you can also consider the following products

Zotero - Zotero is a free, easy-to-use tool to help you collect, organize, cite, and share research.

Mendeley - Easily organize your papers, read & annotate your PDFs, collaborate in private or open groups, and securely access your research from everywhere.

Diigo - Diigo is a powerful research tool and a knowledge-sharing community

Qiqqa - Qiqqa is a free research and reference management software. It can be used in many organizational projects from the academic to the personal to the business endeavor. Read more about Qiqqa.

LINER - LINER AI Copilot is currently powered by ChatGPT/GPT-4, Google Search Engine, and information from high-quality highlights of an enormous number of users from all around the world.

Paperpile - Clean and simple and reference management for the web. Sync your PDFs to Google Drive and cite your papers in Google Docs.