Software Alternatives & Reviews

Wasabi VS Amazon Glacier

Compare Wasabi VS Amazon Glacier and see what are their differences

Wasabi logo Wasabi

Storage made simple. Faster than Amazon's S3. Less expensive than Glacier.

Amazon Glacier logo Amazon Glacier

Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost storage service for data archiving and long-term backup.
  • Wasabi Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-22
  • Amazon Glacier Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-25

Wasabi

Categories
  • Cloud Storage
  • Object Storage
  • Cloud Hosting
  • Cloud Computing
Website wasabi.com
Pricing URL Official Wasabi Pricing

Amazon Glacier

Categories
  • Cloud Storage
  • Object Storage
  • Cloud Hosting
  • Cloud Computing
Website aws.amazon.com
Pricing URL-

Wasabi videos

Introduction to Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage (August 2021) | Wasabi

Amazon Glacier videos

Backing up to Amazon Glacier: What is it and How Does it Work? Synology and ARQ

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Top 5 Amazon Glacier Clients | Best Backup Tools for Amazon Glacier | How to Use Amazon Glacier

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Wasabi and Amazon Glacier)
Cloud Storage
71 71%
29% 29
Cloud Computing
81 81%
19% 19
Object Storage
58 58%
42% 42
File Sharing
70 70%
30% 30

User comments

Share your experience with using Wasabi and Amazon Glacier. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Wasabi and Amazon Glacier

Wasabi Reviews

Wasabi, Storj, Backblaze et al, are promising 80%+ savings compared to Amazon S3... What's the catch?
On the surface, Wasabi looks appealing with a simple pricing structure ($5.99/TB/mo) that comes with free egress and free operations. How can Wasabi afford this, you ask? Well, their business model relies on their user-base keeping their data stored (and unchanged) for some time and not consuming more than their fair share of resources, which they regulate via a handful of...
Source: dev.to

Amazon Glacier Reviews

We have no reviews of Amazon Glacier yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Wasabi should be more popular than Amazon Glacier. It has been mentiond 69 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Wasabi mentions (69)

  • How much 1 TB of egress costs by cloud provider
    This table is missing Wasabi [0], which has free egress. [0]: https://wasabi.com. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • What makes backblaze better than some of the other options out there?
    Backblaze is great because it's a set price, unlimited, and I don't have to think twice about it. I use Arq to backup my machine + external drives (several drives with lots of photos) to my local NAS. Was sending data to Wasabi, but the costs got out of control. I can purchase a year's worth of Backblaze + the 1 year revision upgrade for much, much less of what I was paying at Wasabi. Source: 10 months ago
  • The NixOS Foundation’s Call to Action: S3 Costs Require Community Support
    What about looking at Wasabi? It’s $5.99 per TB per month https://wasabi.com. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • A web application that will need to store lots of image files. The company wants to use Dropbox for image storage. Is this okay?
    No, use AWS S3 or https://wasabi.com/ if you are worried about cost. Source: 10 months ago
  • Veeam backing up to google drive - NOT GCP - is it possible?
    I would suggest that you take a look at Wasabi. They're one of the most used object storage providers with Veeam, offer great performance and cost 5.99$ per TB. Https://wasabi.com/. Source: 11 months ago
View more

Amazon Glacier mentions (28)

  • Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive
    Do you think that Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive is good for digital preservation of my ~300GB video stash? Source: 9 months ago
  • Looking for recommendations for a long term, secure, off-site data storage solution
    Easy - I know about S3 Glaciers but I'd prefer something that doesn't require going through a number of tutorials to use. Source: 12 months ago
  • Is it possible to have cloud ssd and hdd, instead of physic ones?
    The nice thing about AWS is that you could use Amazon S3 Glacier storage if you can live with slower retrieval (5-12 hours). It's really cheap and excellent for non-changing requirements which would be good for media that isn't updating regularly. https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/. Source: 12 months ago
  • How many backups of photos should I have? And where?
    I would recommend Amazon S3 Glacier https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/ . You can explicitly upload files there via web interface or many 3rd party clients. You can also upload to more than one geographical location. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Best place to upload / store 35-50GB daily online?
    What you want, is Amazon Glacier. You're not talking about Backup here, you're talking about Archival. Source: about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Wasabi and Amazon Glacier, you can also consider the following products

Amazon S3 - Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.

Azure Archive Storage - Low cost, secure cloud storage for rarely accessed data.

Backblaze - Backblaze's remote backup automatically backs up your data to our secure datacenter.

Mimecast Cloud Archive - Reduce costs with Mimecast's cloud archive to move to the cloud with a single, secure archive for email, files and other content.

Google Cloud Storage - Google Cloud Storage offers developers and IT organizations durable and highly available object storage.

Rclone - rsync for cloud storage.