Software Alternatives & Reviews

Visual Studio App Center VS BrowserStack

Compare Visual Studio App Center VS BrowserStack and see what are their differences

Visual Studio App Center logo Visual Studio App Center

Continuous everything – build, test, deploy, engage, repeat

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.
  • Visual Studio App Center Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-24
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-05

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

BrowserStack

$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September

Visual Studio App Center features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based: Yes
  • Browser Extensions: Yes
  • SaaS: Yes

Visual Studio App Center videos

Visual Studio App Center

More videos:

  • Review - Xamarin University Presents: Ship Better Apps with Visual Studio App Center
  • Tutorial - How to upload a Xamarin.UITest to Visual Studio App Center!

BrowserStack videos

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Visual Studio App Center and BrowserStack)
Developer Tools
46 46%
54% 54
Website Testing
0 0%
100% 100
IDE
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Visual Studio App Center and BrowserStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Visual Studio App Center and BrowserStack

Visual Studio App Center Reviews

We have no reviews of Visual Studio App Center yet.
Be the first one to post

BrowserStack Reviews

Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Visual Studio App Center should be more popular than BrowserStack. It has been mentiond 24 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Visual Studio App Center mentions (24)

  • Build for IOS
    Appcenter will allow you to build your app for iOS and install on your device without submitting to the App Store. https://appcenter.ms/. Source: 10 months ago
  • Github file size limits
    We've been using app center for build distribution (https://appcenter.ms/). Source: 12 months ago
  • A friend and I have spent way too much time sharing builds so we built this free tool!
    But, https://appcenter.ms/ and others like it are already available with generous free tiers and a lot more features (which you don't have to use, but can grow into), not to mention GitHub actions as others have noted. Does this advantages over existing, standard solutions? Source: 12 months ago
  • Is there a service to let us run our app remotely on chosen hardware and monitor logging?
    There are lots of choices. Google android device testing. Offhand https://appcenter.ms comes to mind. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Using React Native for a cross-platform app, without a Mac
    You don t need a mac, use microsofts app center to build it. https://appcenter.ms. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

BrowserStack mentions (6)

  • Unsupported country
    If you go to browserstack.com (a website to test other websites) you can probably to the chatgpt url and sign up there. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Windows vs Mac?
    For testing on Mac or iOS, use browserstack.com, you'll spend considerably less using that than you would buying the actual hardware. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Free methods for testing websites/apps across devices?
    I've seen subscription services such as browserstack.com and lambdatest.com but I believe they cost to get the full range of mac browsers and devices. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Is it possible to remotely control a cell phone using node?
    In all reality your best bet is probably something like browserstack. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Front-End web development on Linux challenges when displaying on Windows / Mac
    There's no convenient solution. You may find using browserstack.com is a little easier than maintaining Windows and macOS systems locally. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Visual Studio App Center and BrowserStack, you can also consider the following products

TestFlight - iOS beta testing on the fly.

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

Setapp - Your shortcut to prime apps on Mac, an App Store alternative

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Konfigure - APARTMENTS | VILLA | WORKSPACE | RETAIL

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.