Software Alternatives & Reviews

VideoJS VS JW Player

Compare VideoJS VS JW Player and see what are their differences


VideoJS is an HTML5 Video Player, built with Javascript and CSS, with a fallback to a Flash video...

JW Player is an embeddable media player.
VideoJS Landing Page
VideoJS Landing Page
JW Player Landing Page
JW Player Landing Page

VideoJS details

Categories
Marketing Platform YouTube Tools Video CMS
Website videojs.com  

JW Player details

Categories
Marketing Platform YouTube Tools Video
Website jwplayer.com  

VideoJS videos

Demmo

JW Player videos

JW Player Employee Reviews - Q3 2018

More videos:

  • - របៀប Download video ពី JW Player | How to download video from JW Player
  • - How to use JW Player 7 with Wowza Streaming Engine

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to VideoJS and JW Player)
46
46%
54%
54
52
52%
48%
48
100
100%
0%
0
0
0%
100%
100

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, VideoJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on Reddit, HackerNews and some other platforms. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

VideoJS mentions (9)

  • What you can build with JavaScript
    You can play video and audio in browser using HTML5 and JS. The VideoJS library can be helpful. - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago
  • Streaming pre-recorded Videos without using an on premise encoder
    I'm using video.js player, simply supply it with a m3u8 URL as a "src". - Source: Reddit / 21 days ago
  • WatchSeinfeld.net - a single page website that streams episodes of Seinfeld 24/7 and nothing else. Tune in anytime, anywhere.
    ^ which can be played by almost any video player out there like videojs which is the player I used. - Source: Reddit / 4 months ago
  • Can anyone help/advise me on how to achieve this website/video layout:)
    The video in that site is displayed using a videojs player using a fluid layout. An alternative for a responsive website would be the fit mode. See this tutorial on the videojs website for an explanation of both approaches.. - Source: Reddit / 6 months ago
  • Setting Up Mirrors for YouTube Livestreams
    Video.js seemed like a good choice for this sort of thing, and so I hand-rolled some HTML, CSS and JS to put together a simple site hosted on GitHub Pages. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
View all

JW Player mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of JW Player yet. Tracking of JW Player recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing VideoJS and JW Player, you can also consider the following products

Plyr - A simple, accessible and customisable HTML5 media player

MediaElement.js - MediaElement.js provides HTML5 audio and video players in pure HTML and CSS.

Flowplayer - Flowplayer is a video player for web sites.

Accessible HTML5 Video Player - A lightweight HTML5 video player which includes support for captions and screen reader...

FV Player - WordPress's most reliable, easy to use and feature-rich video player.

Wistia - Host, manage, and track your videos with the best video marketing tools in the (known) universe.

User reviews

Share your experience with using VideoJS and JW Player. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Post a review