Underscore.js VS ReactiveX

Not too far behind is Underscore.js, another utility library that's all about enhancing your JavaScript mojo. Whether you're dealing with arrays, objects, or strings, Underscore has got something for you. It's like Lodash's sibling, offering similar functionalities but with its own flair. The choice between them is like picking between chocolate and vanilla - it really comes down to personal taste. - Source: dev.to / 23 days ago

I once made a very crude and simple TiddlyWiki work-alike I called "HulloWurld" https://github.com/calroc/HulloWurld It's 143 KB, but it includes copies of Knockout, Underscore, Zepto, and the "Marked" markdown parser... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ( Good stuff BTW: http://knockoutjs.com/ http://underscorejs.org/ https://zeptojs.com/ https://github.com/chjj/marked ) Probably the only interesting bit is the code to save the page:... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

I am using the excellent Underscore.js library. I have a specific task which I can do fine using JavaScript or jQuery but was wondering if there was some sort of abstraction avaialable in Underscore that I was missing out on. Source: almost 2 years ago

There are many functional libraries for js like underscore, ramda, or even ts specific ones like fp-ts. Source: almost 2 years ago

/* Source: https://underscorejs.org/underscore-esm.js During a given window of time. Normally, the throttled function will run As much as it can, without ever going more than once per `wait` duration; But if you'd like to disable the execution on the leading edge, pass `{leading: false}`. To disable execution on the trailing edge, ditto. */ Function throttle(func, wait, options) { var timeout, context, args,... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

Another option is to use the RxJava library in Java. This library uses reactive programming principles to make it easy to write asynchronous and event-driven code. It's particularly well-suited for handling streams of data and allows you to write code that is both efficient and easy to read. Source: about 1 year ago

The thing that really irks me is that the generator pattern doesn't have to be an OO-first feature. Observable streams[1] work with the same basic foundation and those are awesome for FP. [1]: https://reactivex.io/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

> I’m not sure what you mean by "Rx" in this context. From “reactive extensions”, a proper name for a family of libraries[1] (RxJava, Rx.NET, RxJS), AFAICT one of the first attempted implementations of mature FRP ideas in the imperative world and one messy enough that it took React for anything similar to reënter the mainstream. Compare the enthusiastic HN reception of “Deprecating the observer pattern” in... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

Here’s what you can do with the observer pattern — https://reactivex.io/. Source: about 1 year ago

It's a pretty steep learning curve. For a beginner to programming you should probably implement the other solutions first for the sake of learning, it's just a lot more code. If you eventually move onto Rx, I think https://reactivex.io/ is the "hub". Source: over 1 year ago