tup VS SBT

Whenever looking at one these, I think back to the obscure but interesting "tup": “How is it so awesome? In a typical build system, the dependency arrows go down. Although this is the way they would naturally go due to gravity, it is unfortunately also where the enemy's gate is. This makes it very inefficient and unfriendly. In tup, the arrows go up.” https://gittup.org/tup/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

Once upon a time, you could roll your own of this using `tup` which might have my favorite "how it works" in the readme: How is it so awesome? In a typical build system, the dependency arrows go down. Although this is the way they would naturally go due to gravity, it is unfortunately also where the enemy's gate is. This makes it very inefficient and unfriendly. In tup, the arrows go up. This is... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

Ten years ago, I used reStructuredText and its support for LaTeX math and syntax highlighting. I used tup (tup monitor -a -f) to take care of running rst2html on save. Source: 10 months ago

The dependency resolution is core to https://gittup.org/tup/ which had been adopted a bit at the time it came out but since faded back into obscurity. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

I might be showing my ignorance here, but this just sounds like Tup? https://gittup.org/tup/. Source: about 1 year ago

NOTE: I won’t mention SBT and Leiningen here because, with all due respect, they are niche build tools. I also won’t discuss Kobalt for the same reason (besides, it’s no longer actively maintained). Additionally, I won’t touch upon Bazel and Buck in this context, mainly because I’m not very familiar with them. If you have insights or comments about these tools, please feel free to share them in the comments 👇. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago