Software Alternatives & Reviews

tup VS Ninja Build

Compare tup VS Ninja Build and see what are their differences

tup logo tup

Tup is a file-based build system for Linux, OSX, and Windows.

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.
  • tup Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14

tup videos

The Nitecore TUP Flashlight: The Full Nick Shabazz Review

More videos:

  • Review - Nitecore TUP Review- Best Keychain EDC Flashlight? (1000 Lumens)
  • Review - Nitecore TUP All-Time Favorite EDC Flashlight

Ninja Build videos

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to tup and Ninja Build)
Continuous Integration
45 45%
55% 55
Front End Package Manager
JavaScript Package Manager
DevOps Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using tup and Ninja Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Ninja Build might be a bit more popular than tup. We know about 22 links to it since March 2021 and only 19 links to tup. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

tup mentions (19)

  • Show HN: Hancho – A simple and pleasant build system in ~500 lines of Python
    Whenever looking at one these, I think back to the obscure but interesting "tup": “How is it so awesome? In a typical build system, the dependency arrows go down. Although this is the way they would naturally go due to gravity, it is unfortunately also where the enemy's gate is. This makes it very inefficient and unfriendly. In tup, the arrows go up.” https://gittup.org/tup/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Mazzle – A Pipelines as Code Tool
    Once upon a time, you could roll your own of this using `tup` which might have my favorite "how it works" in the readme: How is it so awesome? In a typical build system, the dependency arrows go down. Although this is the way they would naturally go due to gravity, it is unfortunately also where the enemy's gate is. This makes it very inefficient and unfriendly. In tup, the arrows go up. This is... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • What should I use to take notes in college?
    Ten years ago, I used reStructuredText and its support for LaTeX math and syntax highlighting. I used tup (tup monitor -a -f) to take care of running rst2html on save. Source: 10 months ago
  • Knit: Making a Better Make
    The dependency resolution is core to https://gittup.org/tup/ which had been adopted a bit at the time it came out but since faded back into obscurity. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Buck2: Our open source build system
    I might be showing my ignorance here, but this just sounds like Tup? https://gittup.org/tup/. Source: about 1 year ago
View more

Ninja Build mentions (22)

  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Using Make – writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: 10 months ago
  • Building and Running Pidgin and Finch 3
    Now that you have your build system all generated you can go ahead and build everything. By default Meson will use Ninja as the build tool. Ninja is similar to Make but much much faster. You can also generate additional build systems but that's outside of the scope of this post. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing tup and Ninja Build, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Gradle - Accelerate developer productivity. Gradle helps teams build, automate and deliver better software, faster. DocsExplore the documentation of Gradle. Find installation ..

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

Bazel - Bazel is a tool that automates software builds and tests.