TrueConf VS Sneek

It wasn't Zoom, it was one I'd not heard of before called TrueConf. Guessing they didn't want to use something "cloud" that could have security implications. Humans. It's always the humans that mess up. Source: about 1 year ago

You may check Trueconf, this platform operates reliably in low bandwidth and allows hosting video meetings for up to 1,000 participants with no time limits. It also supports plenty of features for distance learning, e.g., conference recording, slideshow, and video lecture mode. Source: over 1 year ago

You could try these self-hosted solutions: TrueConf, Jitsi or BigBlueButton. The choice generally depends on your needs and company budget. Source: almost 2 years ago

You could try self-hosted solutions: TrueConf, Jitsi or BigBlueButton. Source: almost 3 years ago

You can make a private server of trueconf. Source: almost 3 years ago

I tried using https://sneek.io/ but found it wasn't "presence"-y enough. Source: 11 months ago

It's interesting that you mention body doubles, because for a while I tried to get my team to use Sneek. Sometimes it feels like I've been re-inventing a bunch of stuff in parallel to the ADHD community. Source: 12 months ago

Before corona, I worked a job in an office (I think the workshy slobs are still mad at me, so sparing details). Anyway, we had this devision of essentially HR "people" that would spend their time talking, leaving early, etc. I had no idea how to make them BEHAVE! Essentially, part of what they did was to organize meetings, keep schedule of the work hours of OTHER people =, etc. When the pandemic hit (2 hours less... Source: over 2 years ago

Since the pandemic started, there's been a wave of horrendous surveillance software used by companies with shit cultures who don't know how to manage people remotely. Sneek, as mentioned in this article, for example. It doesn't market itself as awful invasive monitoring software, but jesus christ:. Source: over 2 years ago