Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

TrialKit VS Clinical Conductor CTMS

Compare TrialKit VS Clinical Conductor CTMS and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

TrialKit logo TrialKit

Designed as an end-to-end, cloud-based solution, TrialKit applies the latest in technology to enable interchangeable use of browser-based and mobile app platforms—reflecting all changes from all sources in the database in real-time.

Clinical Conductor CTMS logo Clinical Conductor CTMS

Clinical Conductor is designed to accommodate the unique needs of organization & conduct clinical research.
  • TrialKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-03-04

TrialKit, a low-code/no-code platform available via a web interface and downloadable native mobile app, enables end-to-end clinical trial management for pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device companies of all sizes. Design and deploy regulatory compliant studies in days instead of weeks using our intuitive forms designer that requires no programming. Over 10,000 global users have leveraged the flexibility of TrialKit to deploy over 1,100 studies across all phases of clinical development.

  • Clinical Conductor CTMS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-24

TrialKit videos

No TrialKit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Clinical Conductor CTMS videos

+ Add

Clinical Conductor CTMS

More videos:

  • Review - Clinical Conductor CTMS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TrialKit and Clinical Conductor CTMS)

TrialKit

Clinical Conductor CTMS

Clinical Trial Management System
58 58%
Clinical Trial Management System
42% 42
Clinical Trial Management System (CTMS)
59 59%
Clinical Trial Management System (CTMS)
41% 41
Text Messaging
56 56%
Text Messaging
44% 44
SMS Surveys
51 51%
SMS Surveys
49% 49

User comments

Share your experience with using TrialKit and Clinical Conductor CTMS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Clinical Conductor CTMS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

TrialKit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of TrialKit yet. Tracking of TrialKit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Clinical Conductor CTMS mentions (1)

  • Clinical Trial Management System MArket Growth Analysis Report Forecast to 2026 | Market Data Forecast
    Notable companies operating in the global CTMS market profiled in this report are Bioclinica, Bio-Optronics Inc., DATATRAK International Inc., ERT Clinical, IBM, and Medidata Solutions Inc., MedNet Solutions, Inc., Oracle, Parexel International Corporation, and ArisGlobal. Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TrialKit and Clinical Conductor CTMS, you can also consider the following products

Castor EDC - Castor offers you a user-friendly and fully featured application for electronic data collection.

OpenClinica - OpenClinica is an open source clinical trials software.

Medidata CTMS - Medidata CTMS seamlessly integrates with Medidata Rave to provide real-time views into study progress without manual tracking.

REDCap - REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) is a secure web application for building and managing...

OnCore - OnCore Enterprise Research system supports efficient processes at academic medical centers, cancer centers, and health care systems.

Data+ Research - Data management system for clinical research & bio-banks

Loading...