Categories |
|
---|---|
Website | surge.sh |
Pricing URL | Official surge.sh Pricing |
Details $ |
Categories |
|
---|---|
Website | azure.microsoft.com |
Pricing URL | Official Microsoft Azure Pricing |
Details $ | - |
Based on our record, Microsoft Azure should be more popular than surge.sh. It has been mentiond 63 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
There's also surge.sh (https://surge.sh) but I'm not sure if they have similar policies as Netlify. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Surge: Static web publishing for front-end developers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Surge.sh — Static web publishing for Front-End developers. Unlimited sites with custom domain support. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
"Deploy anything in six keystrokes" https://surge.sh/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Nowadays you can deploy your client side web apps almost anywhere for free, like Netlify, Vercel or Surge or even Firebase hosting. However as we’re using Firebase in this tutorial, let’s explore deploying with firebase as well. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
A VM is the original “hosting” product of the cloud era. Over the last 20 years, VM providers have come and gone, as have enterprise virtualization solutions such as VMware. Today you can do this somewhere like OVHcloud, Hetzner or DigitalOcean, which took over the “server” market from the early 2000’s. Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and Microsoft's Azure also offer VMs, at a less... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Before deploying the application with Kubernetes, you need to containerize the application using docker. This article shows how to deploy a Flask application on Ubuntu 22.04 using Minikube; a Kubernetes tool for local deployment for testing and free offering. Alternatively, you can deploy your container apps using Cloud providers such as GCP(Google Cloud), Azure(Microsoft) or AWS(Amazon). - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Consider cloud storage services for offsite storage and automation (Azure, AWS, GCP). - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
That is what the YAML is for. Securely send data to a specific cloud service ( AWS, Google Cloud, Azure ). They call the whole process, CI/CD, deployment, etc etc etc. (Hey picky, I know they are not the same, but they kind of are.). - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
I make backup snapshots using Restic and I store them in Azure, but I only use Azure because I have some free resources there. There are many other equally good cloud storge providers. I also store a copy of the backups on my desktop. That way I have 3 copies of the data on 2 local machines and 1 remote. Source: 9 months ago
GitHub Pages - A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub
Amazon AWS - Amazon Web Services offers reliable, scalable, and inexpensive cloud computing services. Free to join, pay only for what you use.
Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.
DigitalOcean - Simplifying cloud hosting. Deploy an SSD cloud server in 55 seconds.
Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket
Linode - We make it simple to develop, deploy, and scale cloud infrastructure at the best price-to-performance ratio in the market.Sign up to Linode through SaaSHub and get a $100 in credit!