stenciljs VS Gem.js

stenciljs mentions (42)

• Making Web Component properties behave closer to the platform

  First a disclosure: I never actually used Stencil, only played with it a bit locally in a hello-world project while writing this post. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Plasmic.app – the visual builder for your tech stack

  This is my main concern too. I don't understand why tools like this "pick a winner" with a specific framework instead of rendering to Web Components with a framework wrapper, or using something like Stencil[1] that can render to any framework. [1] https://stenciljs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• Design Systems with Web Components

  I was recently able to sit down with some of the core members of Ionic, who also created Stencil a toolchain for building Design Systems and Progressive Web Apps. We talked at great length how typically companies are approaching Ionic from a Design Team and need help building components. As a developer I wanted to talk about the Web Components that are used within the Design System first. There was a decent amount... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• HTML Web Components

  A web component should do ONE thing whereas a JS framework is a whole ecosystem. I made a video player web component that could take in various inputs, with a torrent file being the most complex of them. I was then able to port it to Vue/React with StencilJS [0] (although it was good to go without). Just drop the `https://stenciljs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• If Web Components are so great, why am I not using them?

  Examples like this bug me. The React example is using a high level abstraction, the web component is directly using the API. A more accurate example would show how those React calls eventually boil down to document.createElement() I don’t think the Web Components API was meant to be used directly all the time. You can use a framework like StencilJS: https://stenciljs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

Gem.js mentions (0)