Steel Bank Common Lisp VS Clozure Common Lisp

I want to add the sbcl-doc subpackage (the manual for SBCL in GNU Info format), but first I need to understand how to write package definitions. As far as I understand there are the "templates" which are shell scripts that describe how a package is to be built and installed, and xbps-src is a shell script which can process these templates to actually carry out the work. - Source: Reddit / over 1 year ago

> Lisp looks like Python, that's far from C, and usually it's a "interpreted" language, far from machine the currently most popular Common Lisp implementation is based around an optimizing native code compiler. That compiler has its roots in the early 80s. See https://sbcl.org . It's far away from being 'interpreted'. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

I have decided it is time to have some fun and use Common Lisp to create algorithm representation that deals with parallel execution. For this I decided to use Clozure common lisp, put basic Qucklisp there and load some libraries to do this. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

CCL also supports windows: https://ccl.clozure.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

The only thing I've not seen said yet is that Clozure Common Lisp will probably be smaller at runtime than the more common SBCL. The latter has better support, however. - Source: Reddit / 9 months ago