Software Alternatives & Reviews

Steel Bank Common Lisp VS CLISP

Compare Steel Bank Common Lisp VS CLISP and see what are their differences

Steel Bank Common Lisp logo Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.

CLISP logo CLISP

CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.
Steel Bank Common Lisp Landing Page
Steel Bank Common Lisp Landing Page
CLISP Landing Page
CLISP Landing Page

Steel Bank Common Lisp details

Categories
IDE Programming Language Text Editor
Website sbcl.org  

CLISP details

Categories
IDE Programming Language Text Editor
Website clisp.sourceforge.io  

Steel Bank Common Lisp videos

No Steel Bank Common Lisp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

CLISP videos

GNU CLISP - Brief introduction to install and setup of an artificially intelligent environment

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Steel Bank Common Lisp and CLISP)
58
58%
42%
42
56
56%
44%
44
54
54%
46%
46
87
87%
13%
13

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Steel Bank Common Lisp should be more popular than CLISP. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on Reddit, HackerNews and some other platforms. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Steel Bank Common Lisp mentions (2)

  • Trying to wrap my head around `xbps-src`
    I want to add the sbcl-doc subpackage (the manual for SBCL in GNU Info format), but first I need to understand how to write package definitions. As far as I understand there are the "templates" which are shell scripts that describe how a package is to be built and installed, and xbps-src is a shell script which can process these templates to actually carry out the work. - Source: Reddit / over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Areas in Programming to Avoid
    > Lisp looks like Python, that's far from C, and usually it's a "interpreted" language, far from machine the currently most popular Common Lisp implementation is based around an optimizing native code compiler. That compiler has its roots in the early 80s. See https://sbcl.org . It's far away from being 'interpreted'. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

CLISP mentions (1)

  • What are the advantages for an imperative language to not be expression based?
    CLisp is an unfortunate contraction, also naming an implementation, but yes, the Common Lisp spec is that big. - Source: Reddit / 2 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Steel Bank Common Lisp and CLISP, you can also consider the following products

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

CMU Common Lisp - CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

Clozure Common Lisp - Clozure CL (often called CCL for short) is a free Common Lisp implementation with a long history.

Armed Bear Common Lisp - Armed Bear Common Lisp (ABCL) is a full implementation of the Common Lisp language featuring both...

Guile - Guile is the GNU Ubiquitous Intelligent Language for Extensions, the official extension language for the GNU operating system.

ManKai Common Lisp - ManKai Common Lisp (MKCL) aims to be a full implementation of the Common Lisp language in...

User reviews

Share your experience with using Steel Bank Common Lisp and CLISP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with