Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

Sly VS Garden (Clojure)

Compare Sly VS Garden (Clojure) and see what are their differences

BoxyHQ
B2B SaaS: Make your app enterprise-ready! featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Sly logo Sly

:smirk: Making CSS Better. Contribute to kbrsh/sly development by creating an account on GitHub.

Garden (Clojure) logo Garden (Clojure)

Unlike the mini-languages that are other pre/post-processor options, Garden leverages the full power of the Clojure programming language for CSS.
  • Sly Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24
  • Garden (Clojure) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-17

Sly

Categories
  • Developer Tools
  • CSS Framework
  • Development Tools
  • Design Tools
Website github.com
Edit details

Garden (Clojure)

Categories
  • Developer Tools
  • CSS Framework
  • Design Tools
  • Development Tools
Website github.com
Edit details

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Sly and Garden (Clojure))

Sly

Garden (Clojure)

CSS Framework
29 29%
CSS Framework
71% 71
Developer Tools
33 33%
Developer Tools
67% 67
Design Tools
36 36%
Design Tools
64% 64
Development Tools
32 32%
Development Tools
68% 68

User comments

Share your experience with using Sly and Garden (Clojure). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Garden (Clojure) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Sly mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Sly yet. Tracking of Sly recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Garden (Clojure) mentions (2)

  • What working with Tailwind CSS every day for 2 years looks like
    Thanks for the vanilla-extract recommendation, I'll be using this! In my case, tailwind was useful for providing a handy set of vocabularies for simple and common stylings. But once customizations start to pile on, we're back into SCSS. Using 2 systems at once meant additionally gluing them with the postcss toolchain, so effectively we have 3 preprocessors running for every style refresh. Looking in at TypeScript... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Clojure Single Codebase?
    I spent some time doing this ~3 years ago, so I don't know about now, but to my knowledge it was the only language where you could really use one language for everything: no HTML (via hiccup), no CSS (via garden), clojure/clojurescript everywhere, and no shell (via babashka). Source: over 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Sly and Garden (Clojure), you can also consider the following products

Stylecow - CSS processor to fix your css code and make it compatible with all browsers

CSS Next - Use tomorrow’s CSS syntax, today.

PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.

Sass - Syntatically Awesome Style Sheets

Stylus - EXPRESSIVE, DYNAMIC, ROBUST CSS

Less - Less extends CSS with dynamic behavior such as variables, mixins, operations and functions. Less runs on both the server-side (with Node. js and Rhino) or client-side (modern browsers only).

Loading...