skim (fuzzy finder) VS fzy

That's great, thank you! Does it check recursive dependencies, and could you make it work against a package you haven't installed yet, by specifying the package name as an argument, rather than it only looking at what's already installed? If that's possible, it would be really good to then run it against a list of popular packages, like [1] or [2], and report back which packages are the highest priority for... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

> it supports my keystrokes You know that there is basically a standard set, imposed by Windows in about 1986 or something and also supported in GNOME 2, MATE, Xfce, LXDE, etc etc.? I am more interested in if it supports them. I mean, I don't know what your set are, and I am not for a moment saying there's anything wrong with them, but there are standards for this stuff, used heavily by millions of blind... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

I've been mostly using fzy which is written in C. I hope skim's matching algorithm is as good as fzy's…. Source: over 1 year ago

Am I the only one who prefers FZY ? https://github.com/jhawthorn/fzy. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

A while ago there was a post on this sub about a plugin called wilder.nvim which looks absolutely awesome. Wilder seems super configurable and it's README has a bunch of different suggested configurations. However, it is designed to work with both Vim and Neovim, but does have a config for Neovim, but it depends on kinda odd plugins like cpsm (which uses ctrlp.vim) as well as fzy. Source: over 2 years ago