SimpleDB VS Google Cloud Bigtable

SimpleDB Reviews

Google Cloud Bigtable Reviews

SimpleDB mentions (6)

• Amazon is laying off another 9,000 employees across AWS, Twitch, advertising

  Amazing that this managed DB service is still running: https://aws.amazon.com/simpledb/. Source: about 1 year ago

• What is the difference between Dynamo and DynamoDB?

  Over the years, Amazon also developed another NoSQL database called SimpleDB. Unlike the original Dynamo, SimpleDB is a managed service so it's easy for teams to adopt and operate. However, SimpleDB can't grow past 10 GB and its performance doesn't scale well (maxes out at around 25 writes per second). Source: over 2 years ago

• Amazon EC2-Classic Is Retiring

  You can actually still use SimpleDB: https://aws.amazon.com/simpledb/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• AWS Quicksight: Authenticating users without SSO but simple DB

  Are you talking about SimpleDB (https://aws.amazon.com/simpledb/) ? If so, I had no idea anyone used this anymore. Source: almost 3 years ago

• Why Google Cloud is less trustworthy than AWS or Azure

  About deprecation: the gold standard is what AWS is doing with SimpleDB: essentially, never. The thing here is that if you run hundreds of services in production - many of which work smoothly and you don't need to touch often, you will find that Google's habit of forcing you to change how to use their tooling will generate a huge burden... They discourage you from using it and make it clear that for every use case... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

Google Cloud Bigtable mentions (6)

• Vaultree and AlloyDB: the world's first Fully Homomorphic and Searchable Cloud Encryption Solution

  In my opinion, Google has built some fantastic database services like Bigtable and Spanner, which literally changed the industry for good, and I am eager to see how they will build upon this new service. With AlloyDB's disaggregated architecture, the dystopian world where I only pay for SQL databases per query and the stored data on GCP seems closer than ever. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Google Cloud Reference

  Cloud Bigtable: Petabyte-scale, low-latency, non-relational 🔗Link 🔗Link. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• A Graph-Based Firebase

  > These triples say that the Layer with id 1 has a fontSize 20 and backgroundColor blue. Since they are different rows, there’s no conflict. This sounds a lot like Bigtable (https://cloud.google.com/bigtable), which also does last-write-wins conflict resolution layer. So this is adding a GraphQL + frontend layer to it? - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• The 4 Types of NoSQL Databases You Need to Know

  Google's BigTable paper inspired this database design, and it is capable of handling large data loads on distributed machines. In addition, column-oriented databases provide efficient compression and high performance with aggregated queries such as sum, average, and minimum. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• Can someone help me understand why data batch processing and data streaming processing pose such different challenges in data management?

  Because of these and other differences, the tools used are also different. With batch processing, data might be read from large files, processed, and stored in an OLTP (Online Transaction Processing) database (like MySQL) or OLAP (Online Analytical Processing) system (like Google BigQuery). But these would not be good solutions for streaming applications, because they are not optimized for high throughput on a lot... Source: about 2 years ago