Software Alternatives & Reviews

rkt VS MooseFS

Compare rkt VS MooseFS and see what are their differences

rkt logo rkt

App Container runtime

MooseFS logo MooseFS

MooseFS is a fault tolerant, network distributed file system.
  • rkt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-08
  • MooseFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24

rkt videos

RKT IPO Review | Is Rocket a Buy for 2020? | Matt Mulvihill

More videos:

  • Review - 2018 Niner RKT 9 RDO - First Look and Build Kit Overview
  • Review - Best Stock Picks Today | RKT Stock 9-2-20

MooseFS videos

A look at MooseFS and LizardFS distributed file systems

More videos:

  • Review - MooseFS – Distributed File System – Overview

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to rkt and MooseFS)
Cloud Computing
71 71%
29% 29
Cloud Storage
56 56%
44% 44
Storage
60 60%
40% 40
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using rkt and MooseFS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare rkt and MooseFS

rkt Reviews

5 Container Alternatives to Docker
In 2018, 12 percent of production containers were rkt (pronounced “Rocket”). Rkt supports two types of images: Docker and appc. A selling point of rkt is its pod-based process that works out of the box with Kubernetes (also referred to as “rktnetes”). In Kubernetes, an rkt container runtime can easily be specified:

MooseFS Reviews

We have no reviews of MooseFS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, MooseFS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

rkt mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of rkt yet. Tracking of rkt recommendations started around Mar 2021.

MooseFS mentions (2)

  • Garage, our self-hosted distributed object storage solution
    MooseFS is designed for large files and can have a global goal of 1 copy (no replication) https://moosefs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Can someone tell me if this is possible or even a good idea?
    My friends and I all use Linux and often use each others laptops or desktops when we forget ours. Then I had the idea to install Linux on a USB so I could have all my stuff and use my system on any system. Which was cool but then I ran into the same problem of forgetting it sometimes. So my new idea (which I have no idea how I'd achieve) is to use something like MooseFS or ceph or some distributed filesystem for... Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing rkt and MooseFS, you can also consider the following products

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability

BeeGFS -   Download What is BeeGFS? BeeGFS (formerly FhGFS) is a parallel cluster file system, developed with a strong focus on performance and designed for very easy installation and management.

Apache ServiceMix - Apache ServiceMix is an open source ESB that combines the functionality of a Service Oriented Architecture and the modularity.