Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Redux.js VS Inferno

Compare Redux.js VS Inferno and see what are their differences

Redux.js logo Redux.js

Predictable state container for JavaScript apps

Inferno logo Inferno

An extremely fast React-like javascript library for building modern user interfaces.
  • Redux.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-17
  • Inferno Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-11

Redux.js features and specs

  • Predictable State Management
    Redux provides a single source of truth for the state of your application, which makes it easier to manage and debug. The state changes in a predictable way, which helps in maintaining consistency across the application.
  • Ecosystem and Community
    Redux has a large community and a rich ecosystem of middleware, development tools, and libraries. This support can accelerate development and troubleshooting.
  • Time-Travel Debugging
    With tools like Redux DevTools, developers can leverage features such as action logging, hot-reloading, and time-travel debugging, helping to understand and trace state changes effectively.
  • Middleware Support
    Redux supports middleware that lets you intercept actions and perform side effects like API calls, logging, or modifying actions before they reach reducers. This makes handling asynchronous operations more manageable.
  • Compatibility with React
    Although Redux can be used with any front-end library or framework, it pairs particularly well with React. Libraries like React-Redux offer seamless integration, making it easier to bind React components to the Redux store.

Possible disadvantages of Redux.js

  • Boilerplate Code
    Redux often requires a significant amount of boilerplate code, including actions, reducers, and store configuration. This may result in more verbose code, especially for simple applications.
  • Learning Curve
    Understanding the principles of Redux, such as actions, reducers, and the store, along with concepts like immutability and pure functions, can be challenging for beginners.
  • Performance Overhead
    Due to its strict immutability principles and the frequent creation of new state objects, Redux can introduce performance overhead, especially in large applications with complex state management needs.
  • Rigid Structure
    While the rigid structure of Redux can enforce good practices, it can also be restrictive and inflexible for certain types of applications. Developers might find it cumbersome to work within the boilerplate constraints.
  • Not Always Necessary
    For simple or small applications, the complexity that Redux introduces can be overkill. In such cases, alternatives like the Context API in React or simpler state management solutions might be more appropriate.

Inferno features and specs

  • High Performance
    Inferno is known for its impressive speed and performance, often comparable to or surpassing many other front-end frameworks and libraries, making it suitable for high-performance applications.
  • React-Like API
    Inferno uses a similar API to React, which makes it easier for developers who are already familiar with React to transition to or integrate Inferno.
  • Compatibility
    Due to its React-like API, Inferno can work with many existing React components and libraries, enhancing its versatility and integration capabilities.
  • Small Size
    Inferno has a small footprint, reducing load times and improving overall application performance, especially on mobile devices and slower networks.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    Inferno supports server-side rendering out of the box, allowing for faster initial page loads and better SEO.

Possible disadvantages of Inferno

  • Smaller Community
    Inferno has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to more widely used libraries and frameworks like React, potentially leading to fewer resources, plugins, and support.
  • Limited Third-Party Libraries
    While compatibility with React libraries is a strength, there are still fewer third-party libraries specifically designed for Inferno, which can limit development options in some scenarios.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are not familiar with React, there can be a learning curve associated with understanding the Inferno API and concepts.
  • Infrequent Updates
    Compared to larger projects like React, Inferno may have less frequent updates and new feature releases, which can impact the adoption of the latest web development trends.
  • Less Market Demand
    There is currently less market demand for developers proficient in Inferno compared to those skilled in more popular frameworks and libraries, potentially affecting job prospects and opportunities.

Redux.js videos

No Redux.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Inferno videos

Inferno - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - Inferno - Movie Review
  • Review - Inferno - Official Movie Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Redux.js and Inferno)
Javascript UI Libraries
76 76%
24% 24
JS Library
100 100%
0% 0
JavaScript Framework
0 0%
100% 100
Front-End Frameworks
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Redux.js and Inferno. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Redux.js and Inferno

Redux.js Reviews

We have no reviews of Redux.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Inferno Reviews

The Best JavaScript Frameworks You’re Not Using
There isn’t an overall number we can use to gauge performance on the chart above, but smaller numbers are better. Obviously, Inferno performs very well again. If you’re a React developer and have a project that requires excellent performance, Inferno is definitely something you should consider. We’ll finish with this from the Inferno “About” page:
Source: jsreport.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Redux.js seems to be a lot more popular than Inferno. While we know about 189 links to Redux.js, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Inferno. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Redux.js mentions (189)

  • Very Basic - Redux
    If you need more in depth information check out the documentation. https://redux.js.org/ It's actually pretty great. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
  • Architecture and Design Patterns in Front-End
    In frontend, the most probably well-known approach is Flux and its most common implementation, Redux. This is an example of unidirectional data flow. - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago
  • Organisation of Data Flows
    The best known example of an architecture with unidirectional data flow is Flux and, as its implementation, Redux. - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago
  • Valentine’s Day Breakup: React Dumps Create React App
    CRA makes integrating libraries like Redux and React Router easy without requiring complex Webpack and Babel configurations. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • UmiJS: the Shaolin of web frameworks
    Dva. A plugin-based state management solution (Redux + Sagas). Also quite popular in narrow communities outside of the Umi world. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
View more

Inferno mentions (2)

  • Solid vs React - the Fastest VS the Most Popular UI Library
    Some might argue that React’s relatively poor performance (it’s still plenty-fast for many apps) is due to Virtual DOM and prioritization of development experience, i.e., clarity over complexity. To counter the first argument - there’s React-like Inferno. For the second one - there’s Solid. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • A Look at Compilation in JavaScript Frameworks
    A VDOM library like Inferno uses this information to compile its JSX directly into pre-optimized node structures. Marko, and Vue hoist their static VDOM nodes outside of their components so that they don't incur the overhead of recreating them on every render. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Redux.js and Inferno, you can also consider the following products

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

Preact.js - Preact is a fast 3kB alternative to React with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.

react-context - Context provides a way to pass data through the component tree without having to pass props down manually at every level.

Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps

Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps

Deku - Functional view library for building UI components as an alternative to React