Software Alternatives & Reviews

Racket Lang VS Coq

Compare Racket Lang VS Coq and see what are their differences

Racket Lang logo Racket Lang

Racket (formerly PLT Scheme) is a modern programming language in the Lisp/Scheme family, suitable...

Coq logo Coq

Coq is a proof assistant, which allows you to write mathematical proofs in a rigorous and formal...
  • Racket Lang Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30

We recommend LibHunt Racket for discovery and comparisons of trending Racket projects.

  • Coq Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-17

Racket Lang videos

🏸 Top & Best Selling Badminton Rackets 2020 (review of Year 2019) 🏆

Coq videos

Ubiquinol CoQ-10 Supplement Review

More videos:

  • Review - Gumbenni listened to Sseth's review on Coq

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Racket Lang and Coq)
Programming Language
77 77%
23% 23
OOP
73 73%
27% 27
Generic Programming Language
IDE
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Racket Lang and Coq. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Racket Lang should be more popular than Coq. It has been mentiond 91 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Racket Lang mentions (91)

  • Racket–the Language-Oriented Programming Language–version 8.12 is now available
    Racket—the Language-Oriented Programming Language—version 8.12 is now available from https://racket-lang.org See https://racket.discourse.group/t/racket-v8-12-is-now-available/2709 for the release announcement and highlights. Thank you to the many people who contributed to this release! Feedback Welcome. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Racket version 8.11.1 is now available
    Racket version 8.11.1 is now available from https://racket-lang.org/. Source: 5 months ago
  • Ask HN: Does anyone Lisp without Emacs?
    Racket (https://racket-lang.org) has an IDE (DrRacket) which isn't EMACS. ARC (which powers hacker news) is (was?) written in Racket. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Racket branch of Chez Scheme merging with mainline Chez Scheme
    I had a look at https://racket-lang.org. Where we can download this build? - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Douglas Crockford to Keynote 'From Here to Lambda and Back Again' at Racke
    I signed up for RacketCon, joining remotely. I am looking forward to it a lot. Usually I use the Racket language perhaps for 10% of my personal projects, but I am currently writing a Racket AI book, so all things Racket are of current interest. Past RacketCons have been a lot of fun. I usually use Common Lisp, but Racket is batteries included Scheme, and more, and is a very pleasant language and ecosystem. Just in... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

Coq mentions (46)

  • The First Stable Release of a Rust-Rewrite Sudo Implementation
    Are those more important than, say: - Proven with Coq, a formal proof management system: https://coq.inria.fr/ See in the real world: https://aws.amazon.com/security/provable-security/ And check out Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • In Which I Claim Rich Hickey Is Wrong
    Dafny and Whiley are two examples with explicit verification support. Idris and other dependently typed languages should all be rich enough to express the required predicate but might not necessarily be able to accept a reasonable implementation as proof. Isabelle, Lean, Coq, and other theorem provers definitely can express the capability but aren't going to churn out much in the way of executable programs;... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • If given a list of properties/definitions and relationship between them, could a machine come up with (mostly senseless, but) true implications?
    Still, there are many useful tools based on these ideas, used by programmers and mathematicians alike. What you describe sounds rather like Datalog (e.g. Soufflé Datalog), where you supply some rules and an initial fact, and the system repeatedly expands out the set of facts until nothing new can be derived. (This has to be finite, if you want to get anywhere.) In Prolog (e.g. SWI Prolog) you also supply a set of... Source: 10 months ago
  • Mark Petruska has requested 250000 Algos for the development of a Coq-avm library for AVM version 8
    Information about the Coq proof assistant: https://coq.inria.fr/ , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coq. Source: 11 months ago
  • Basic SAT model of x86 instructions using Z3, autogenerated from Intel docs
    This type of thing can help you formally verify code. So, if your proof is correct, and your description of the (language/CPU) is correct, you can prove the code does what you think it does. Formal proof systems are still growing up, though, and they are still pretty hard to use. See Coq for an introduction: https://coq.inria.fr/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Racket Lang and Coq, you can also consider the following products

Clojure - Clojure is a dynamic, general-purpose programming language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming.

Agda - Agda is a dependently typed functional programming language. It has inductive families, i.e.

Guile - Guile is the GNU Ubiquitous Intelligent Language for Extensions, the official extension language for the GNU operating system.

Isabelle - Isabelle is a proof assistant for writing and checking mathematical proofs by computer.

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

Lean - Clean up your Live Photos