Puma VS Cherokee

Compare Puma VS Cherokee and see what are their differences

LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Cherokee

High-performance web server

Landing page //
2023-06-13

Landing page //
2023-01-25

The Ford Puma has an onboard foot SPA! REVIEW

Cherokee videos

+ Add

2019 Jeep Cherokee - Review & Road Test

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Puma and Cherokee)

Cherokee

Application Server

40 40%

Application Server

60% 60

Web Servers

25 25%

Web Servers

75% 75

Web And Application Servers

28 28%

Web And Application Servers

72% 72

HTTP/2 Web Server

100 100%

HTTP/2 Web Server

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Puma and Cherokee. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Puma and Cherokee

Puma Reviews

Unicorn vs. Puma vs. Passenger: which app server is right for you?

There's a reason Puma is the default app server for newly generated Rails apps and on Heroku today: it's easy to configure and mostly "just works" out-of-the-box. It makes a lot of sense to start with Puma and evaluate Passenger as your app grows and needs more advanced features and configuration options.

Source: scoutapm.com

Cherokee Reviews

We have no reviews of Cherokee yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Puma seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Puma mentions (3)

Breaking the 300 barrier
As we use Puma as our webserver for our rails application, I quickly went to Puma's config file which typically resides in config/puma.rb. The config was set as. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
What's new in Ruby 3.1?
One more thing - any top-of-mind examples of you squeezing more performance by making similar changes in the context of Puma? Source: about 2 years ago
Ask HN: Coming back to Web/Ruby/Rails since 2012. Help?
Welcome back. It's still the best choice in the Ruby world, well maintained, responsive and new features added. Shopify and github use it, you might want to look at the Rails 6 annoucements what these companies added for scalability features. There've been changes to the asset pipeline since version 3 but you'll still recognize it. You can run Rails as API-only and there's subprojects/tutorials for combining a... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago