Software Alternatives & Reviews

Portage VS pacman (package manager)

Compare Portage VS pacman (package manager) and see what are their differences

Portage logo Portage

Portage is source-based package manager used by Gentoo and its descendants. It controls all process from fetching source through building it, installing into clean environment to "merging" with already installed software.

pacman (package manager) logo pacman (package manager)

The pacman package manager is one of the major distinguishing features of ...
  • Portage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-26
  • pacman (package manager) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-07

Portage

Categories
  • Developer Tools
  • Package Manager
  • Front End Package Manager
  • Containers As A Service
Website wiki.gentoo.org

pacman (package manager)

Categories
  • Front End Package Manager
  • Package Manager
  • Work Music
  • Windows Tools
Website wiki.archlinux.org

Portage videos

Nursing video 2 portage learning, prerequisite courses

More videos:

  • Review - THOROGOOD 1892 PORTAGE Series #814-6522 [ THE BOOT GUY REVIEWS ]
  • Review - Thorogood Portage Boots Review in Indigo Chromexcel

pacman (package manager) videos

No pacman (package manager) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Portage and pacman (package manager))
Package Manager
45 45%
55% 55
Front End Package Manager
Windows Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Portage and pacman (package manager). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, pacman (package manager) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 39 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Portage mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Portage yet. Tracking of Portage recommendations started around Mar 2021.

pacman (package manager) mentions (39)

  • Been thinking of switching to linux but I am a noob
    However, that "pacman -S" command has lots of switches (see section 1.1.1 ==> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman ). Source: 4 months ago
  • Project on GitHub - Customizable Arch Linux Podman images based on the official Arch Linux Docker image
    Automatic installation of packages during building utilizes pacman and aurman with the supported "package sources" being:. Source: 9 months ago
  • A response to the Fedora 40 Privacy-Preserving Telemetry Proposal
    * Package management and DNF syntax usage are big topics. Follow the Arch Wiki example for the "pacman" package management tool ==> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman. Source: 9 months ago
  • Could someone make a Decky plugin that automates installing common dependencies?
    Should be possible as the Arch distro SteamOS is built on includes pacman. Source: 10 months ago
  • How to install optional dependencies
    All of this is explained in the wiki page. Source: 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Portage and pacman (package manager), you can also consider the following products

Conda - Binary package manager with support for environments.

Synaptic - Please take a minute to watch our video, it gives an overview of Synaptic's role in financial services.

pkgsrc - pkgsrc is a framework for building over 17,000 open source software packages.

Chocolatey - The sane way to manage software on Windows.

Pacman - Pacman was developed to be the package manager for Arch Linux, and is also used by KDE-focused Chakra Linux.

Pamac - Graphical Package Manager for Manjaro Linux (based on libalpm).