Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

Phusion Passenger VS Puma

Compare Phusion Passenger VS Puma and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Phusion Passenger logo Phusion Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a multi-language (Ruby, Python, Node) web & app server which can integrate into Apache and Nginx

Puma logo Puma

A concurrent web server for Ruby.
  • Phusion Passenger Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-31
  • Puma Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-13

Phusion Passenger videos

+ Add

Phusion Passenger Standalone: basic usage (old version)

Puma videos

+ Add

The Ford Puma has an onboard foot SPA! REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - 2021 Ford Puma review – why it's the best new small SUV on sale | What Car?
  • Review - Ford Puma 2021 review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Phusion Passenger and Puma)

Phusion Passenger

Puma

Web And Application Servers
91 91%
Web And Application Servers
9% 9
Application Server
91 91%
Application Server
9% 9
Web Servers
92 92%
Web Servers
8% 8
Ruby Application Server
100 100%
Ruby Application Server
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Phusion Passenger and Puma. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Phusion Passenger and Puma

Phusion Passenger Reviews

Unicorn vs. Puma vs. Passenger: which app server is right for you?
I'm probably stating the obvious, but you can't use a multithreading app server if your app isn't threadsafe. In that case, Puma, Unicorn, and Passenger can all work. For Puma, you'll just limit each worker process to one thread. It then behaves like Unicorn or the open-source Passenger version.
Source: scoutapm.com

Puma Reviews

Unicorn vs. Puma vs. Passenger: which app server is right for you?
There's a reason Puma is the default app server for newly generated Rails apps and on Heroku today: it's easy to configure and mostly "just works" out-of-the-box. It makes a lot of sense to start with Puma and evaluate Passenger as your app grows and needs more advanced features and configuration options.
Source: scoutapm.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Puma should be more popular than Phusion Passenger. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Phusion Passenger mentions (1)

  • Passenger isn't loading my app directory
    Okay so, I tried a few things. I'll do some explaining so we're on the same page, since it's my first project and I don't really know what I'm talking about. I'm following this guide on the phusionpassenger.com website. Source: 11 months ago

Puma mentions (3)

  • Breaking the 300 barrier
    As we use Puma as our webserver for our rails application, I quickly went to Puma's config file which typically resides in config/puma.rb. The config was set as. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • What's new in Ruby 3.1?
    One more thing - any top-of-mind examples of you squeezing more performance by making similar changes in the context of Puma? Source: about 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Coming back to Web/Ruby/Rails since 2012. Help?
    Welcome back. It's still the best choice in the Ruby world, well maintained, responsive and new features added. Shopify and github use it, you might want to look at the Rails 6 annoucements what these companies added for scalability features. There've been changes to the asset pipeline since version 3 but you'll still recognize it. You can run Rails as API-only and there's subprojects/tutorials for combining a... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Phusion Passenger and Puma, you can also consider the following products

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Unicorn - Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections.

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

NGINX Unit - A dynamic web and application server with Go, PHP, Python, Perl, and Ruby support.

Loading...