Categories |
|
---|---|
Website | pharo.org |
Details $ |
Categories |
|
---|---|
Website | julialang.org |
Details $ |
Based on our record, Julia should be more popular than Pharo. It has been mentiond 114 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I think in part it's because the idea that programming is text and math-based is too ingrained in society. For example, we talk about programming languages. But IMO there are also programming systems such as Smalltalk [1]. I've programmed 2 years professionally in it, currently looking for an engagement in a different language (a curiosity thing, also a resume thing). I think Smalltalk has a lot to offer by... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Glamorous Toolkit (https://gtoolkit.com/) and the underlying Pharo (https://pharo.org/). Writing Pharo code (a modern implementation of Smalltalk) in the GT environment is the most fun I've had programming in years. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
I read Pharo for just a split second. Source: 5 months ago
I imagine something like https://pharo.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
What you need is a cross platform GUI framework that still is a mutable environment allowing easy extend ability with a simple language. May I suggest Pharo Smalltalk? Source: 11 months ago
I'm really not fond of that agpt landing page. So many red flags; the AI-generated background, mailing letter box with accompanying email-beggar text, the Discord button (!!!) being given as much space as the Github repo click-through... it's a mess. The whole website feels more boilerplate than content. I mean, look at these quotes! > With the help of the incredible open-source community, we’re making... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
I’m wondering if there are any attempts for a ROS2 client library for Julia(lang)? I very much like the concepts of Julia and would like to use it in my robotics applications. I believe, that writing code in Julia is very efficient and productive. As a robotics engineer and researcher, I would definitively appreciate the possibility to use ROS2 with Julia. Source: 8 months ago
Kevin is a senior research scientist (read: fancy postdoc) at Wellesley College. He has a PhD in immunology, but transitioned to microbial genomics after graduate school, and now spends most of his time writing code (ask me about julia). His first postdoc was looking at the microbes that grow on the outer surface of cheese (it's a cool model system for studying microbial communities - here's the paper) and now... Source: 9 months ago
Julia is a great alternative in terms of raw speed/performance (not a compatible language). Source: 10 months ago
If you are really committed to running on Apple hardware then take a look at Tensorflow for macOS. Another option is the Julia programming language which has very basic Metal support at a CUDA-like level. FluxML would be the ML framework in Julia. I’m not sure either option will be painless or let you do everything you could do with a Nvidia GPU. Source: 11 months ago
C++ - Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation
Python - Python is a clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
D (Programming Language) - D is a language with C-like syntax and static typing.
GNU Octave - GNU Octave is a programming language for scientific computing.
V (programming language) - Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software.
MATLAB - A high-level language and interactive environment for numerical computation, visualization, and programming